VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Ravi v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 17700/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 14.03.2026.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made a representation dated 14.03.2026 before the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the sale deeds in Doc.No.9047/2019 dated 25.06.2019, Doc.No.11867/2019 dated 19.08.2019, Doc.No.11868/2019 dated 19.08.2019, Doc.No.11869/2019 dated 19.08.2019 and Doc.No.14458/2019 dated

11.10.2019 at SRO Avadi as null and void. However, till date, the said representation was not considered. Hence, this writ petition. Page3 of 4

¶3Mr.M.Roshan Atiq, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and submitted that the official respondents have no power to cancel the sale deeds, as the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of M.Kathirvel Vs., Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration and Others, reported in 2024 SCC Online Mad 6154 has struck down Sections 77A and 68(2) of the Registration Act. Hence, the right course available to the petitioners is to file a civil suit before the appropriate forum.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Government's Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, this writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file a civil suit before the Civil Court in the manner known to law. No costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM To:

¶1The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai 600028.

¶2The District Registrar, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District.

¶3The Sub Registrar, Avadi 600 054.

¶4Bajaj Housing Finance Limited, Rep by its Authorised Signatory unit 804, 805, 806 Delta Wing 8th Floor, Raheja Towers 177 Ann Salai, Chenani 600002. 02-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1. M.Ravi 2. Punithavalli ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai 600028. 2. The District Registrar, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Avadi 600 054. 4. Mr.K.Jayaraman 5. Mrs.Indhirani 6. Shanthi 7. Baby 8. D. Ragupathy 9. V. Purushothaman 10.P. Thilagavathi 11.M. Sonaramgujar 12.Mr.N.R.Nagaraj 13.Mulaviyammal 14.Vijayalakshmi 15.M.V. Thirumoorthy (Minor) 16.G. Prakash 17.K. Sri Devi 18.Bajaj Housing Finance Limited, Rep by its Authorised Signatory Page2 of 4 Unit 804, 805, 806 Delta Wing 8th Floor, Raheja Towers 177, Ann Salai, Chenani 600002. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the any Deeds in nature in Doc.No.9047/2019 dated 25.06.2019, Doc.No.11867/2019 dated 19.08.2019, Doc.No.11868/2019 dated 19.08.2019, Doc.No.11869/2019 dated 19.08.2019 and Doc.No.14458/2019 dated 11.10.2019 at SRO Avadi, by considering our representation dated 14.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.S.Bhuvaneswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Roshan Atiq, Government's Counsel for R1 to 3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.