VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

V.Valarmathi v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 16425/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents to cancel the alleged erroneous TSLR entries for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition based on the petitioner's representation, dated

23.03.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner also seeks for a direction to include her husband's name in the TSLR for the subject property. The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with this Writ Petition in support of her representation.

¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties which includes the parties in whose names presently the TSLR for the subject property stand, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶5For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation, dated 23.03.2026 seeking for cancellation of the alleged erroneous TSLR entries for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition by including the names of Arumugam and Varadharajan after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing all the necessary parties which includes the parties in whose names the TSLR presently stand, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

27.04.2026 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order : yes/no grs To

¶1The District Collector, Chennai District, Office of the District Collector, Singaravelar Maligai, Beach Road, Chennai.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, M.Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai Collectorate, No.62, Rajaji Salai, George Town, Chennai – 600 001.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer, Integrated South Chennai Revenue Office Campus, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶4The Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk Office, Gandhi Road, 1st Main Road, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.

¶5The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Guindy, Chennai.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. grs

27.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.04.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE V.Valarmathi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The District Collector, Chennai District, Office of the District Collector, Singaravelar Maligai, Beach Road, Chennai. 2. The District Revenue Officer, M.Singaravelar Maligai, Chennai Collectorate, No.62, Rajaji Salai, George Town, Chennai – 600 001. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Integrated South Chennai Revenue Office Campus, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 4. The Tahsildar, Velachery Taluk Office, Gandhi Road, 1st Main Road, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042. 5. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Guindy, Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 23.03.2026 and consequently cancel the erroneous TSLR entries bearing TS No.58, TS No.59 and TS No.60, and issue fresh TSLR entries including the names of Mr.Arumugam, S/o. Late Chinnappan and Mr.Varadharajan, S/o.Late Nagappan (grandson of Late Chinnappan) in respect of the property bearing No.138, Peeliamman Koil Street, Tharamani village, Chennai – 600 113, comprised in Survey No.27, Block No.6, within the limits of Velachery Taluk. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Calvin Jones For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.