Sudhaher Reddi v. The State of Tamil Nadu

ORDER W.M.P.No.16818 of 2026 filed seeking permission to the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition is ordered subject to payment of separate Court fee.

¶2This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to exclude the land more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition as per the provisions of Section 48-B of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Page3 of 6

¶3Even though the aforesaid prayer is sought for by the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit, on instructions, that the petitioner is not seeking for reconveyance of the lands acquired from the petitioner but instead he is seeking only for enhanced compensation for the acquired lands.

¶4Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 3 would submit that by order dated 01.07.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1983 of 2021 etc. batch, the petitioner has been permitted to seek for enhanced compensation in respect of the entire lands, which is the subject matter of this writ petition.

¶5According to the petitioner, the respondents have directed the petitioner to approach the Court to enable the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for payment of enhanced compensation in respect of the entire lands, which is the subject matter of this writ petition.

¶6As seen from the order of the Division Bench of this Court, referred to supra, the petitioner has been granted liberty to approach the respondents and seek for enhancement of compensation in respect of the lands acquired by the respondents under the Land Acquisition Act. The proceedings of the respondents have also been placed on record by the petitioner before this Court, Page4 of 6 which reveals that the respondents have directed the petitioner to approach the Court and seek permission for the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for payment of enhanced compensation in respect of the lands acquired from the petitioner, which is the subject matter of this writ petition.

¶7No prejudice would be caused to any other parties if the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation to the respondents seeking for payment of enhanced compensation in respect of the lands, which are subject matter of this writ petition and a direction is issued to the competent authority to consider the same on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶8Accordingly, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the third respondent seeking for payment of enhanced compensation in respect of the lands, which were acquired from the petitioner under the Land Acquisition Act, which is the subject matter of this writ petition, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation within the stipulated time, the third respondent shall pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation within a period of twelve (12) weeks thereafter. Page5 of 6 This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 21-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gm To

1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,

3.The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Page6 of 6

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. gm 21-04-2026

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.16818 of 2026 1. Sudhaher Reddi S/o.C.Venkata Reddy 2. C.Gangarathinam, W/o.C.Sudhaher Reddi 3. C.V.Muralikrishna, S/o.C.Sudhaher Reddi 4. C.Vijayasekara Reddy, S/o.C.Sudhaher Reddi 5. C.Chandra Shekar, S/o.C.Sudhaher Reddi 6. E.Thulasi W/o.E.Sadasiva Reddi Petitioners 2 to 6 are represented By their Power Agent Mr. C. Sudhaher Reddi (Herein Petitioner No.1) ..Petitioners Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Page2 of 6 3. The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to exclude the land under Section 48-B of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or under Section 101 of Act, 30 of 2013 belongs to the petitioners on the grounds of non-utilization of land over a period of 51 years and thereby in alternative to pay the compensation, as per the directions given by this Court under Act 30 of 2013 for the properties of various petitioners, as described in the petition. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Subba Reddy For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader [R1 & R3] Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar, Standing Counsel [R2] *****