VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Chinnaiyan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 14246/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'writ petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].

¶2Ms. A. Akshaya, learned counsel representing Mr.C.Prabhu, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before us.

¶3Adverting to a representation dated 04.03.2024 from the writ petitioner, learned counsel for writ petitioner submitted that there is alleged encroachment in 'pathway at S.No.266/13D, Deviyakurichi Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District' [hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by RR 4 and 5. To be noted, RR 4 and 5 are private respondents. Page Nos.2/6

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in juxtaposition with G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 {hereinafter 'said GO' for the sake of convenience} which puts in place a removal of encroachment procedure inter alia giving opportunity to alleged encroachers, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be finally disposed of.

¶5In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, captioned WP was taken up.

¶6It was submitted by learned State counsel that said GO has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands. Page Nos.3/6

¶7In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Attur, Salem qua said GO.

¶8This Court directs the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said land.

¶9The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua said GO shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment), report the encroachment to appropriate authorities concerned for further action (for removal of encroachment). To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on their own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 14 weeks from today i.e., by 18.09.2025.

¶10It is open to the writ petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there is any change of circumstances. Page Nos.4/6

¶11We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said land as it turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land.

¶12Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (H.C., J.)

12.06.2025 Index : NC : cad Page Nos.5/6

M.SUNDAR, J. and

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cad To

¶1The District Collector Salem District Salem 636 001

¶2The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluka Salem District 636 112

¶3The Block Development Officer Thalaivasal Taluka Salem District

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Salem W.P.No.14246 of 2024

12.06.2025 Page Nos.6/6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.14246 of 2024 Chinnaiyan Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Salem District Salem 636 001 2. The Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluka Salem District 636 112 3. The Block Development Officer Thalaivasal Taluka Salem District 4. Nadesakumar 5. Ayyammal Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.03.2024 to remove encroachment put up by respondents 4 and 5 and construct a public Page Nos.1/6 toilet for women at Survey No.266/13D, Deviyakurichi Village, Thalaivasal Taluka, Salem District, as per resolution no.23 dated 26.01.2024 passed by Deviyakurichi Village Panchayat. For petitioner Ms. A. Akshaya for Mr. C. Prabhu For RR 1 to 3 Mr. T.K. Saravanan Additional Government Pleader For RR 4 & 5 Mr. A.M. Esakiappan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.