- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 April 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 9904/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
16.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 123 of B.N.S. in Cr. No.119 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 4
¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 16.03.2026, the petitioner along with other accused, found in possession of 12 nos. of banned narcotic pills. Hence, this case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody on 16.03.2026 and he is an innocent. The learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner has not at involved in the occurrence as alleged by the prosecution and co-accused were released on bail and hence prayed to enlarge him on bail.
¶4However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that there are three accused and the present petition has been filed by A2 and he has 8 previous cases in his credit and among which, one case is a murder case and hence prays to dismiss the petition.
¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.
¶6Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the co-accused has been released on bail, even according to the prosecution, the petitioner was charged for the possession of 12 nos. of banned narcotic Page3 of 4 tablets and he has been under incarceration since 16.03.2026. However, the learned Government Advocate opposed the bail application on the ground that the petitioner has 8 previous cases in his credit and among which, one case is of murder case. Hence considering the totality of circumstances and taking into consideration of previous bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is of the firm view that it is not an appropriate stage to consider the bail application.
¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21-04-2026 MJS Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To
¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
¶2The Inspector of Police, Anupparpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur City. CRLoOPoNo.o9904oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MJS CRLoOPoNo.o9904oofo2026 21-04-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Vignesh @ Koola Ganesh S/o.Kumar, 8/72C Maha Vishnu Nagar, Angerpalayam, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police, Anupparpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur City. [Cr.No.119/2026] ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.119/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/S. M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.