- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 15652/2026
Judgment
ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 03.08.2024, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 22.05.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order dated
03.08.2024.
¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired long before. However, the present Writ Petition has been filed only on
16.04.2026. Page3 of 6
¶5The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 29.06.2024,
09.07.2024 and 25.07.2024, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed on 08.07.2024, 17.07.2024 and
01.08.2024. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.
¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner appears through VC and submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication as was ordered in W.P.No.15659 of 2026 for the Assessment Year 2018-2019.
¶7Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 22.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated
03.08.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 22.05.2024. Page4 of 6
¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.
¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page5 of 6
¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 24-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order jas To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sholinganallur Assessment Circle, Room No.218, 2nd Floor, Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, (South Tower), Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. WPoNo.15652oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. jas WPoNo.15652oofo2026 and W.M.P.Nos.16868oando16869oofo2026 24-04-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.16868 and 16869 of 2026 Harith Constructions, Represented by its Proprietor Sasikumar, No.42, First Street, Seevaram, Kancheepuram, Chennai – 600 096. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sholinganallur Assessment Circle, Room No.218, 2nd Floor, Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, (South Tower), Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Respondent herein in impugned order in Form DRC – 07 having reference No.ZD3308240231110 dated 03.08.2024 for the Financial Year 2019-20 passed under Section 73 of the Tamilnadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 herein after referred to as GST Act, 2017 and quash the same as arbitrary, unjust and illegal and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent to consider the matter afresh on merits after providing an opportunity of personal hearing. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.