VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Padma v. The Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 April 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 10094/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 316(3), 316(4) and 318 BNS in Crime No.93 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein stole TMT iron bars of the de facto complainant c. Hence, this case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there are about four accused and the present petitioners are A3 and A4. The 1st petitioner is mother and 2nd petitioner is son of the 1st petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioners were not involved in the crime, as they were only hired as lorry owners by A2 and A3 to transport the TMT iron rods. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that occurrence took place on 18.03.2026 and these petitioners are lorry owners. Except the above overt act, there are no other material allegation against these petitioners and as per the prosecution, theft was committed by A1 and A2. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking into consideration of the factual position and upon the fact that the 1st petitioner being woman, this Court is of the firm view, at this length of time, custodial Page3 of 5 interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; Page4 of 5

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 22-04-2026 SHL To:

¶1The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District

¶2The Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thrivallur District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras CRLoOPoNo.o10094oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPANoJ. SHL CRLoOPoNo.o10094oofo2026 22-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1. M.Padma 2. Sumesh ..Petitioners Vs The Inspector of Police Sipcot Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Thrivallur District. (Crime No.93 of 2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to release the petitioner in event of arrest by the respondent in crime No.93/2026 (on the file of the Inspector of police, sipcot police station, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District). For Petitioners: Mr.E.Ravi For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Govt.Advocate (Crl Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.