VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Palani v. The Tashildhar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 April 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 15420/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated 02.02.2026, with the assistance of the 2nd respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

02.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 1st respondent and Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 1st respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the Page2 of 4 objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owner as well as any other party whom they deem fit to put on notice, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 1st respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owner, and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the 1st respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the 1st respondent, the 2nd respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order.

(d) There shall be no order as to costs. 21-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The Tashildhar Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶2The Inspector of Police Kambainallur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. 21-04-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Palani ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tashildhar Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 2. The Inspector of Police Kambainallur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to dispose of petitioner's Survey Application No.2026/0123/05/000644 dated 02.02.2026 to survey the Agriculture land in the Irumattur Village Survey No.149/2A, an extent of Property over 81 cents in Karimangalam Taluk, Dharmapuri District and mark the boundaries based on the meats and bounds for fencing his agriculture land along with the necessary and appropriate police protection. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate (For R1) Page1 of 4 Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (For R2)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.