M/S.Kannan Agencies, v. The State Tax Officer Inspection Vi

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP Nos. 16049 & 16055 of 2026 and WMP Nos.17293 & 17298 of 2026 M/s. Kannan Agencies, Rep by its Proprietor Prakash Govindarajan Old No.28.28-A, New No.98, Gayathriamman Kovil Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu-608 001 ..Petitioner (in both cases) Vs The State Tax Officer Inspection VI Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, No.1, Vallalar Nagar, Majakuppam, Cuddalore-607 001 ..Respondent (in both cases) Prayer in WP.No.16049 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the order vide GSTIN vide GSTIN 33AAFFK9892F1Z0/ 2025-2026, dated

24.02.2026. along with Consequential order through FORM GST DRC-07 dated

24.02.2026 under Section 74 of the act for the financial year 2025-2026, to quash the same. Page2 of 6 Prayer in WP.No.16055 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings initiated by the Respondent in the impugned order in FORM GST DRC - 07 bearing ref No. ZD330226212109U dated 24.02.2026 along with Annexure vide GSTIN/Period 33AAFFK9892F1Z0/ 2023-24 Dated 24.02.2026 passed by the respondent for the AY 2023-24 and to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr. J.R. Devanand For Respondent(s): Mr. C. Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader COMMON ORDER Mr. C. Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2These Writ Petitions are being disposed of at the stage of admission itself, with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondent.

¶3The Petitioner is before this Court against the respective Impugned Orders dated 24.02.2026, whereby the proposals in the Show Cause Notices dated 13.11.2025 have been confirmed in the absence of reply. Page3 of 6

¶4It is the specific case of the Petitioner that the credit notes issued by the Petitioner were indeed furnished, however, the same have not been considered by the Respondent while passing the above said Impugned Orders dated 24.02.2026.

¶5The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner is ready to satisfy the demand confirmed in the respective Impugned Orders, if the case may be remitted back to the Respondent, enabling the Petitioner to file proper replies along with necessary relevant documents.

¶6He further submits that the Petitioner is willing to deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. An endorsement has also been made in both bundles by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. The said endorsement reads as under:- "In W.P.No.16049

of 2026:

I do hereby consent to deposit 10% of the disputed tax In W.P.No.16055 of 2026: I, counsel for the Petitioner do hereby consent to deposit 10% of the disputed tax."

¶7The learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent has no objection to the above arrangement. Page4 of 6

¶8Recording the above consent, the Impugned Orders dated

24.02.2026 are set aside and the cases are remitted back to the Respondent for fresh consideration and to pass a fresh order on merits, after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner, subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice dated 13.11.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the Impugned Order dated 24.02.2026 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 13.11.2025.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. Page5 of 6

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall issue due notice to the Petitioner and afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petitions stand disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 24-04-2026 klt To The State Tax Officer Inspection VI Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, No.1, Vallalar Nagar, Majakuppam, Cuddalore-607 001. WPoNo.o16049oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. klt WPoNos.o16049o&o16055oofo2026 and WMPoNos.17293o&o17298oofo2026 24-04-2026 Page6oofo6