D.Prisca Sam Rajitha v. The District Registrar

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to set right the anomaly in respect of D.No. 1354/ 1954 in S.No. 255/2B as 225/2B mentioned wrongly by the 2nd respondent Sub Registrar, Poonamallee, Thiruvallur District by giving direction to the District Registrar, Thiruvallur as per the proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 2130/ M1/ 2025 dated 21.04.2025 and that of Letter No. 220/ 2025 dated 21.05.2025 and directing the 2nd respondent Sub Registrar, Poonamallee to carry out mistake.

¶2According to the petitioner, the parental document was registered at Poonamallee Sub Registrar Office in D.No.1158/1929, dated 15.03.1929 in Patta No.225 in S.No.225/2B. It is stated that one among the parental document registered on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Poonamallee dated

10.08.1954 as No.1386/1954 wherein, it is mentioned as Patta No.225, "S.No.225/2B" instead of "S.No.255/2B". It is also stated that in the registered Document No.1386 executed in the year 1954, the survey number has been mentioned clearly as "255/2B" whereas in the Government record, the survey number has been mentioned wrongly as "225/2B". Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.04.2025 to correct the index. Till date, no orders has been passed, the present writ petition is filed. Page3 of 4

¶3In reply, the learned Government counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondents will consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.04.2025 and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record.

¶5In view of the above, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 03.04.2025 and pass appropriate orders, rectifying the error made in the document, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioner. In the event if any original document is required to be produced before the Sub-Registrar, the petitioner is directed to produce the same.

¶6With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page4 of 4

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN To

¶1The District Registrar, Thiruvallur District.

¶2The Sub Registrar, Poonamallee Sub Registrar office, Thiruvallur District. 08-06-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY D.Prisca Sam Rajitha, W/o. Late. Dr. M.Ravi, No.22, CPM Church Street, Thandurai, Pattabiram, Chennai 600 072. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Registrar, Thiruvallur District. 2. The Sub Registrar, Poonamallee Sub Registrar office, Thiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to set right the anomaly in respect of D.No. 1354/ 1954 in S.No. 255/2B as 225/2B mentioned wrongly by the 2nd respondent Sub Registrar, Poonamallee, Thiruvallur District by giving direction to the District Registrar, Thiruvallur as per the proceedings in Na.Ka.No. 2130/ M1/ 2025 dated 21.04.2025 and that of Letter No. 220/ 2025 dated 21.05.2025 and directing the 2nd respondent Sub Registrar, Poonamallee to carry out mistake. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.R.Nixon For Respondent(s): Mr.Dominic S.David Government Counsel Page2 of 4