VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Indumathi v. A.Ramakrishnan

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 March 2026
Bench
S Justice R. Kalaimathiauthor
Case no.
TR CMP 574/2025

Judgment

O R D E R This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to withdraw the O.P.No.3 of 2025 pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Arni, and transfer the same to the Family Court, Tiruvallur.

¶2Transfer of O.P.No.3 of 2025 on the file of Sub-Court, Arni is sought for by the petitioner/wife on the ground that she is residing in Tiruvallur with her parents. It is her grievance that she finds it very difficult to travel 120 Kms., from Tiruvallur to Arni for every hearing. She is depending entirely on her father for her expenses and therefore, she is not able to spend money for travel for every hearing, since the matter is before the Sub-Court, the presence of the parties is mandatory.

¶3Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶4The principles regarding transfer petitions, more specifically in the matters of matrimonial cases are well settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the following cases:- "i. In AIR 2000 SC 3512 (1) (Mona Aresh Goel vs. Aresh Satya Goel), when the wife pleaded that she was unable to bear the traveling expenses and even to travel alone and stay at Bombay, the Supreme Court ordered transfer of proceedings. ii. In 2000 (10) SCC 304 (Geeta Heera Vs. Harish Chander Heera), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that where the petitioner's wife has pleaded lack of money, the same has to be considered. iii. In Lalita A. Ranga Vs. Ajay Champalal Ranja reported in (2009) 9 SCC 355 , wherein the wife, who was having small child and she was finding it difficult to travel from Jaipur to Bombay, and the Hon'ble Apex Court accepting her request ordered the transfer petition in favour of the wife transferring the transfer petition from Family Court at Bandra in Mumbai to the Family Court at Jaipur."

¶5On perusal of petition filed in O.P.No.3 of 2025, it appears that petitioner/husband is the resident of Tiruvannamalai District and the respondent/wife is the resident of Tiruvallur District.

¶6In consideration of the above said details, the request of the petitioner herein / wife appears to be based on justifiable cause and accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Sequel to this, O.P.No.3 of 2025 pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Arni is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Tiruvallur. The Family Court, Tiruvallur on receipt of the records to try and dispose of the matter in accordance with law at the earliest. No Costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

05.03.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssn To

¶1The Subordinate Court, Arni.

¶2The Family Court, Tiruvallur.

¶3The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. R.KALAIMATHI,

J.,

ssn and C.M.P.No.14056 of 2025

05.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and C.M.P.No.14056 of 2025 S.Indumathi ... Petitioner Vs A.Ramakrishnan ... Respondent PRAYER: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to withdraw the above mentioned O.P.No.3 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Arni, and transfer the same to the Family Court, Tiruvallur. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thyagarajan For Respondent : Mr.P.Mani

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.