VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

E.Saravanan v. The State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 April 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 10547/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. Nirmal Kumar

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee, to expedite the proceedings in C.C.No. 245/2024 arising out of Crime No. 18 of 2023, pending before the Page2 of 5 learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee, and to complete the same within a time frame.

¶2The petitioner, who is the defacto complainant, lodged a complaint and based on which, a case in Crime No.18 of 2023 was filed for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC. On completion of investigation, now charge sheet has been filed and the case has been taken on file as C.C.No. 245 of 2024. It is seen that 22 witnesses have been cited in the charge sheet. The petitioner seeks a direction for expeditious disposal of the case.

¶3The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that there are nine accused in this case and all of them are appearing before the Trial Court. He further submitted that the petitioner has filed a petition under Section 319 Cr.P.C. before the Trial Court to add one more person as an accused.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) further submitted that the petitioner has lodged another complaint against the same set of persons, resulting in registration of Crime No.48 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 420 and 471 IPC. It is informed that in the said case, investigation is going on and it it will take six months to file the file final report. It is also submitted that there is substantial overlap in the evidence and materials in both cases. Hence, it Page3 of 5 would be appropriate that both cases are tried together (though separately), so as to avoid conflicting findings and to ensure proper appreciation of evidence.

¶5In view of the above submissions, this Court is of the considered opinion that, upon filing of the final report in Crime No.48 of 2025, the Trial Court shall take appropriate steps to conduct the trials in both cases simultaneously, but separately, in accordance with law. The Trial Court is further directed to make every endeavour to dispose of both cases as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of filing of the final report in Crime No.48 of 2025.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 27-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order PVS Page4 of 5 To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee

¶2The Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch, Avadi, (Avadi City-CCB), (Land Grabbing,LGA), Commissionerate of Avadi, Avadi, Chennai. (Crime No. 18/2023)

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o10547oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. PVS CRLoOPoNo.o10547oofo2026 27-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR E.Saravanan ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by its Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Avadi, (Avadi City-CCB), (Land Grabbing, LGA), Commissionerate of Avadi, Avadi, Chennai. (Crime No. 18/2023) ..Respondent(s) To direct the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee, to expedite the proceedings in C.C.No. 245/2024 arising out of Crime No. 18/2023, pending before the Learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee, and to complete the same within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.G.Thiyagu For Respondent(s): Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.