C.Anjana Reddy v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to cancel the UDR patta issued in the names of the respondents 4 to 9 for the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 02.06.2024, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2According to the petitioner, illegally, the respondents 4 to 9 have obtained UDR patta in their names for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks cancellation of the UDR patta issued in favour of the respondents 4 to 9 Page No.2 of 6 for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. He had given a representation on 02.06.2024 to the respondents 1 to 3 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered by the official respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 9 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 to 9 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 to 9 as well as any other party, whom the 2nd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation. Page No.3 of 6

¶5For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation, dated 02.06.2024 seeking cancellation of UDR patta issued in favour of the respondents 4 to 9 for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 4 to 9 as well as any other party, whom the 2nd respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

24.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District Collector Office, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Sub Collector, Hosur, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Tashildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

24.04.2026 Page No.6 of 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.Anjana Reddy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District Collector Office, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Sub Collector, Hosur, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Tashildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 4.Krishna Reddy 5.Chandran 6.Muni Reddy 7.Murukesh 8.Hanuma Reddy 9.Sasikala ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondents to cancel the UDR patta issued to the 4th to 9th Respondent, property Page No.1 of 6 situated at No.27, Kempachathiram Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishangiri District, comprised in (a) S.No.13/3, to an extent of 39.50 Ares (97 cents), (b) S.No.13/5, to an extent of 0.23.00 Ares (57 cents), (c) S.No.13/2, to an extent of 0.30.50 Ares (75 cents), and issued for grant of patta in the petitioner favour for the property by considering the petitioner representation dated 2.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sellapandian For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [R1 to R3] Notice dispensed with [R4 to R9] *****