- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2025
- Bench
- M. Sundar, Hemant Chandangoudar
- Case no.
- WP 16833/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar
Judgment
ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Captioned main 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) has been filed for issue of a writ of mandamus qua statutory appeal dated 27.03.2025 being statutory appeal (hereinafter 'said statutory appeal' for the sake of convenience and clarity) under Section 10 of 'the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905)' (for brevity 'said 1905 Act') assailing the notice dated 17.03.2025 issued by R3 (Tahsildar) under Section 6 of said 1905 Act.
¶2To be noted, R1 (District Collector, Nagapattinam) is the Appellate Authority as regards said statutory appeal. It is also to be noted that subject matter of appeal is the land measuring an extent of
0.04.0 ares of a total extent of 0.19.0 ares in Survey No.463/2 in Thiruvasalkulam area, Neyvilakku Village, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. Page Nos.2/6
¶3Mr. K. Venkataramani, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. V. Kasinatha Bharathi, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, submits that along with said statutory appeal, an application filed under Section 10-B of said 1905 Act seeking stay, is also pending.
¶4Issue notice to respondents for the present.
¶5Mr. K. Suresh, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondents and submits that the aforereferred stay petition will be disposed of by R1 within a period of three weeks from today i.e., on or before 23.06.2025.
¶6The aforesaid submission of learned State counsel is recorded. We make it clear that coercive action, if any, shall be subject to outcome of the stay petition. Page Nos.3/6
¶7Captioned WP stands disposed of in the aforesaid manner by recording the aforesaid submission made by learned State counsel. As we have held that coercive action (if any) shall be subject to/depending on the outcome of the stay petition, captioned writ miscellaneous petitions thereat have become otiose and therefore, the same are disposed of as closed. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (H.C.,J.)
02.06.2025 Index : Yes / No cad Page Nos.4/6 To
1.The District Collector Nagapattinam Nagapattinam District
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Vedaranyam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District
3.The Tahsildar Vedaranyam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District
4.The Revenue Inspector Karappampulam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District Page Nos.5/6
M.SUNDAR, J. and
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cad W.P.No.16833 of 2025
02.06.2025 Page Nos.6/6
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.No.16833 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.19079 & 19081 of 2025 T.Karthikeyan Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector Nagapattinam Nagapattinam District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Vedaranyam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District 3.The Tahsildar Vedaranyam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District 4.The Revenue Inspector Karappampulam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner on 27.03.2025 against Section 6 notice of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905, issued by the 3rd respondent. Page Nos.1/6 For petitioner : Mr. K. Venkataramani Senior Counsel for Mr. V. Kasinatha Bharathi For respondents : Mr. K. Suresh Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.