- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 16293/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to survey and demarcate the property morefully disclosed in the prayer of this writ petition, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her online application, dated 13.03.2026.
¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on
13.03.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same was not considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the 4th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the Page No.2 of 4 objections, if any, from the 4th respondent, the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party, whom they deem fit to put on notice. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the 4th respondent, the neighbouring land owners, and also to any other party, whom they deem fit to put on notice.
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct the survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(c) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
24.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp To
1.The Tahsildar, Office of The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107.
2.The Taluk Surveyor, Office of The Taluk Surveyor, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107.
3.The Village Administrative Officer, Kelamangalam Town, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107. Page No.3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,
J.
sp
24.04.2026 Page No.4 of 4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.04.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.17486 of 2026 Errammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Office of The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107. 2.The Taluk Surveyor, Office of The Taluk Surveyor, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107. 3.Village Administrative Officer, Kelamangalam Town, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District – 635 107. 4.G.Roopa ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to issue proper notice to all concerned parties, to fix an early date for survey, to conduct survey, fix boundaries, assign sub-division for the petitioner's land in S.No.519/2B1, and demarcate the land measuring an extent of 2 ¾ cents (1198 sq.ft.) in S.No.519/2B1 at Kelamangalam Town, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ethirajulu For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader [R1 to R3] Notice dispensed with [R4] *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.