VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

T.Sakthivel v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 June 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 16734/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Captioned 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) pertains to S.F.No.10, Old S.No.477/2-P, Ward D, Block 36, Athur Town, Athur Taluk, Salem District (hereinafter 'said land' for the sake of convenience and clarity). Page Nos.2/8

¶2Mr. I. Abrar Mohamed Abdullah, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, submits that there is encroachment in said land, RR 8 and 9 (private respondents) are alleged encroachers, repeated representations have been made for removal of encroachment, the same have not yielded results and that has necessitated the captioned WP.

¶3Issue notice to the official respondents (RR 1 to 7).

¶4Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for RR 2 and 4 and Mr. M.S. Arasakumar, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for RR 1,3,5,6 and 7.

¶5Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned State counsel, submits, on instructions that survey of said land will be completed within four weeks from today i.e., on or before 30.06.2025.

¶6Learned State counsel also submits that a survey report will be drawn up by R6 (Tahsildar) with the aid of R5 (Town Surveyor) and in the survey report, if any encroachment is found, alleged Page Nos.3/8 encroachers, be it private respondents (RR 8 and 9) or any other person/entity will be put on notice i.e., show caused vide Section 128 of the amended Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 (hereinafter 'The TNULB Act' for the sake of brevity).

¶7This means that private respondents (RR 8 and 9) and/or any other encroacher(s) will have a say and they will be given an opportunity to put forth their version. In this view of the matter, we make it clear that we are not passing an order which is touching upon the rights of private respondents in any manner and on the contrary, we are preserving all the rights and contentions of private respondents. Therefore, we dispense with notice to private respondents.

¶8In the light of the aforesaid scenario, with the consent of learned counsel on either side, captioned WP is taken up.

¶9The following order is made: Page Nos.4/8 i. Survey qua said land, after putting all concerned on notice, will be concluded as expeditiously as the official business of RR 5 and 6 would permit but in any event within a period of four weeks from today i.e., on or before 30.06.2025; ii. Survey report will be drawn up by R6; iii. In the survey report, if any encroachment qua said land is noticed, be it by private respondents or any other person/entity, they will be put on notice inter alia vide Section 128 of the TNULB Act which, in effect, means that the alleged encroachers would be given an opportunity and an order will be made by R2 after considering the version of the alleged encroachers on or before 28.07.2025 and thereafter, law will take its own course qua removal of encroachments, if that be so; and Page Nos.5/8 iv. Though obvious, as alluded to supra, we make it clear that we preserve all the rights and contentions of the private respondents and/or any other noticee qua the TNULB Act, if that be so. Captioned WP stands disposed of in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (H.C.,J.)

02.06.2025 cad Page Nos.6/8 To

1.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem

2.The Commissioner Attur Municipality Attur Municipal Office Ranipet Main Road Attur, Salem District 636 102

3.The Sub Collector Salem District Salem

4.The Block Development Officer Attur Taluk Salem District

5.The Town Surveyor Attur Taluk Salem District

6.The Tahsildar Attur Taluk Salem District

7.The Inspector of Police Attur Town-Police Station Salem District Page Nos.7/8

M.SUNDAR, J. and

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cad

02.06.2025 Page Nos.8/8

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR T. Sakthivel Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector Salem District Salem 2.The Commissioner Attur Municipality Attur Municipal Office Ranipet Main Road Attur, Salem District 636 102 3.The Sub Collector Salem District Salem 4.The Block Development Officer Attur Taluk Salem District 5.The Town Surveyor Attur Taluk Salem District 6.The Tahsildar Attur Taluk Salem District Page Nos.1/8 7.The Inspector of Police Attur Town Police Station Salem District 8.Priya 9.Mani ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachments made by respondents 8 and 9 in Anna Street in S.F.No.10, Old S.No.477/2-P, Ward D, Block 36, Athur Town, Athur Taluk, Salem District. For petitioner : Mr. I. Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For RR 1,3,5,6 & 7 : Mr. M.S. Arasakumar Government Advocate For RR2 & 4 : Mr. T.K. Saravanan Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.