L.Padma v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 13.06.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN --- L.Padma .. Petitioner in W.P.No.19123 of 2025 J.Deepalakshmi .. Petitioner in W.P.No.19126 of 2025 Vs.

¶1The District Collector, Vellore District Collectorate, Vellore District - 632 009.

¶2The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Anna Salai, Vellore-632 009.

¶3The Commissioner, Vellore Municipal Corporation, Vellore - 632 001.

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vellore-632 001.

¶5The Tahsildar, Vellore Taluk Office,

Velapadi, Vellore-632 001.

¶6The Inspector of Police, C.4 Sathuvachari Police Station, Vellore-632 009.

¶7Mrs.Amala Reegan, 20th Ward Councillor, No.49, TAHDCO Nagar, Vellore-632 009.

¶8Mr.Regan, Zonal Secretary of "Viduthalai Chiruthaigal" party, No.49, TAHDCO Nagar, Vellore - 632 009.

¶9Mr.Thol Thirumavalavan, President of "Viduthalai Chiruthaigal" Party, Head Office at No.62, TNHB Colony, 2nd Avenue, Velachery-600 042.

.. Respondents in both the petitions Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to take necessary action against 7th and 8th respondents on the petitioner's representation letter dated 19.04.2025.

For petitioners in both the Writ petitions: Mr.A.Ramesh Manikandan For respondents in both the Writ Petitions: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Govt. Advocate (Criminal Side) for RR-1 to 6 COMMON ORDER Both the present Writ Petitions have been filed to direct the first and second respondents to take necessary action against the seventh and eighth respondents on the petitioner's representation letter dated 19.04.2025.

¶2The main grievance of the petitioners is that, despite giving complaint, with proper materials, the respondents 1 and 2 have not taken any action against respondents 7 and 8, since they are Councillor or wife of the Councillor of the ruling party. Under the influence of respondents 7 and 8, they are also threatening the petitioners and have also put up shed. In order to substantiate the same, the petitioners' counsel had also produced pen-drive consisting of photographs and CCTV footage and in which the respondents have been present in the scene of occurrence. In view of the same, this Court finds

that there are prima-facie materials against the respondents.

¶3Hence, the second respondent is directed to take action against the respondents 7 and 8 and consider the representation/letter of the petitioners, dated 19.04.2025 and conduct enquiry and if prima-facie case is made out, register a case against them and proceed further in accordance with law.

¶4However, the properties in occupation of the petitioners are also alleged to have been the Government properties and therefore, the first respondent is directed to take appropriate steps in case the occupation of the petitioners is a Government Poramboke and take action against the petitioners also in accordance with law and evict the petitioners, if necessary, by due process of law.

¶5With the above observations/directions, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

13.06.2025 cs

To

¶1The District Collector, Vellore District Collectorate, Vellore District - 632 009.

¶2The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Anna Salai, Vellore-632 009.

¶3The Commissioner, Vellore Municipal Corporation, Vellore - 632 001.

¶4The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vellore-632 001.

¶5The Tahsildar, Vellore Taluk Office, Velapadi, Vellore-632 001.

¶6The Inspector of Police, C.4 Sathuvachari Police Station, Vellore-632 009.

¶7The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.VELMURUGAN, J cs W.P.Nos.19123 & 19126 of 2025

13.06.2025