- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 18626/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2026.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are the absolute owners of the subject property by virtue of a registered Sale deed dated 07.04.2016. It is submitted that though the Patta No.778 was issued in their names, the extent of land has been wrongly recorded as the measurements relating to the above survey numbers have been erroneously interchanged in the patta, contrary to the title document. It is furthers submitted that a portion of the property was acquired by the National Highways authorities and compensation has been paid, however, the patta has not been updated to reflect the correct remaining extent of land. Therefore, the petitioners have given a representation 18.03.2026 for conducting survey of the subject property and to rectify the incorrect entries in Patta No.778 relating to Survey Nos.153/2B2 and 154/2B1B situated at Thandalam Village, Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur District. Till date, the representation has not been considered at all. Hence, the present writ petition. Page3 of 4
¶3In reply, the learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioners' representation dated 18.03.2026 will be disposed of by the respondents within a period of eight weeks.
¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Counsel for the official respondents and also perused the materials available on record.
¶5In view of the above, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 18.03.2026, conduct enquiry and pass appropriate orders on the same, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
¶6With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KKN Page4 of 4
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. KKN To
¶1The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Chinna Ekkadu, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur-602 001.
¶2The Tahsildar,, Uttukottai Taluk office, Uttukottai Road, Uttukottai, Tiruvallur-602 026.
¶3The Surveyor, Uttukottiai Taluk Office, Uttukottai Road, Uttukottai, Tiruvallur-602 026. 05-06-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY 1. Sherly Manuel, W/o.Eric Boddingtone, No.53, 1st Main Road, Lambert Nagar, Alwar Thirunagar, Chennai-600 087. 2. Shaji Manuel, S/o. Manuel No.53, 1st Main Road Lambert Nagar, Alwar Thirunagar, Chennai-600 087. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Chinna Ekkadu, Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur-602 001. 2. The Tahsildar,, Uttukottai Taluk office, Uttukottai Road, Uttukottai, Tiruvallur-602 026. 3. The Surveyor, Uttukottiai Taluk Office, Uttukottai Road, Uttukottai, Tiruvallur-602 026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to cause immediate necessary action on the representation dated 18.03.2026 for within a time frame. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Kaviya Sri For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan Government Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.