VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

B.Ezhumalai v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 June 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 18576/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

ORDER [made by M.SUNDAR, J.] Subject matter of captioned 'writ petition' [hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity] is alleged encroachment in 'a stream in S.Nos.254/6 and 256/1 in Olakkur Melpathi Village and Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District' (hereinafter 'said lands' for the sake of convenience and clarity). Page Nos.2/6

¶2Request for removal of aforereferred alleged encroachments by way of as many as four representations dated

29.07.2019, 07.09.2019, 25.11.2019 and 12.02.2025 has not yielded results and that has necessitated captioned WP, is the submission of Mr. J. Agni Selvaraju, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner.

¶3Issue notice to official respondents (RR 1 to 4).

¶4Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for RR 1 to 3 and Mr. P. Gurunathan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for R4. Learned State counsel submit that survey of said lands will be done within a period of four weeks from today, i.e., on or before 01.07.2025, and depending on the outcome of the survey, action for removal of encroachment (if found) will be commenced vide the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (Tamil Nadu Act III of 1905) or any other appropriate / applicable statute, as expeditiously as the business of official respondents would permit but in any event within a period of four weeks therefrom, i.e., on or before 29.07.2025. This submission is recorded. Page Nos.3/6

¶5Though obvious, we make it clear that all the rights and contentions of RR 5 to 8 (private respondents) stand preserved and this order does not impinge upon their rights. Therefore, there is no impediment in dispensing with notice to RR 5 to 8 and taking up the captioned WP with the consent of the learned State counsel and learned counsel for writ petitioner. We do so.

¶6In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP is disposed of in the aforesaid manner, recording the stated position of learned State counsel. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S., J.) (H.C., J.)

03.06.2025 cad Page Nos.4/6 To

¶1The District Collector Collectorate Villupuram Villupuram District 605 602

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Sub Collector Tindivanam Villupuram District 604 001

¶3The Tahsildar Tindivanam Taluk Villupuram District 604 001

¶4The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Olakkur Panchayat Union Saram Village & Post Tindivanam Taluk Villupuram District 604 307 Page Nos.5/6

M.SUNDAR, J. and

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cad

03.06.2025 Page Nos.6/6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR B. Ezhumalai Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Collectorate, Villupuram Villupuram District 605 602 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum-Sub Collector Tindivanam Villupuram District 604 001 3. The Tahsildar Tindivanam Taluk Villupuram District 604 001 4. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Olakkur Panchayat Union Saram Village & Post Tindivanam Taluk Villupuram District 604 307 5. E. Venkatesan 6. V. Nagalingam 7. A. Ravi 8. A. Siva Respondents Page Nos.1/6 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to remove the illegal encroachments made by the respondents 5 to 8 on stream (Government Land) comprised in Survey Nos.254/6 and 256/1, situated at, Olakkur Melpathi Village & Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District and to restore the stream to its original shape and condition, within a time frame. For petitioner Mr. J. Agni Selvaraju For RR 1 to 3 Mr. T.K. Saravanan Addl. Govt. Pleader For R4 Mr. P. Gurunathan Addl. Govt. Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.