VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Shajan Immanuval v. State Rep.By Forest Range Officer,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 May 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 10912/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 2(16), 9 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, Section 21(3) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act 1882 in WLOR.No.3 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The allegation against the petitioners are that on 14.04.2026 at night hours, petitioners trespassed into the reserved forest area with weapon and attempted to hunt a wild boar. Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and on instructions submitted that the respondent police seized the weapon from the accused and vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also perused the records available.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that the weapon has been seized from the accused, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions. Page3 of 6

¶7Accordingly, the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand only) as cost to the Tamil Nadu Advocate's Clerk's Association, Chennai, Account No. 484026006, Branch: Indian Bank High Court, IFSC No.IDIB000M157 and on such payment, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pandalur, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. Page4 of 6

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 06-05-2026 jai/GBI Page5 of 6 To

1.State rep.By Forest Range Officer, Birtherkad Forest Range, The Nilgiris. W.L.O.R.No.Not Known of 2026

¶2the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pandalur

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o10912oofo2026 L.VICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ. GBI CRLoOPoNo.o10912oofo2026 06-05-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI 1. Shajan Immanuval 2. Balakrishnan 3. Pradeesh KB ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.By Forest Range Officer, Birtherkad Forest Range, The Nilgiris. W.L.O.R.No.Not Known of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in W.L.O.R. No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.J.Franklin For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.