VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Poongodi v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 17745/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated

03.03.2026 passed by the 3rd respondent.

¶2Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the impugned order was passed without conducting any proper enquiry which is a clear violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, he requests this Court to set aside the said impugned order. Page3 of 5

¶5Further, he would contend that the 3rd respondent had passed the impugned order as a non-speaking order without assigning sufficient reasons. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondent had confirmed the above submissions and would request this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶7Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record.

¶8In the case on hand, upon perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the 3rd respondent had passed the said order as a non-speaking order, without assigning sufficient reasons. Further, it was submitted that no proper enquiry was conducted prior to the passing of impugned order. In such case, there is no doubt that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and hence, the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:-

(i) The impugned order dated 03.03.2026 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the respondent for fresh consideration. Page4 of 5

(ii) The respondent is directed to issue notice to all the concerned parties and conduct enquiry and thereafter, pass a detailed speaking order, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The District collector Erode District, Erode.

¶2The Tahsildar Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District.

¶3The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District.

¶4The Village Administrative Officer Siruvalur Village, Erode District. WPoNo.o17745oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o17745oofo2026 ANDoWMPoNO.o19071oOFo2026 04-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 19071 OF 2026 Poongodi W/o.Palanisamy, No.116, Chinnappan Street, Kuppandampalayam, Siruvalur Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District- 638 054. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Erode District, Erode. 2. The Tahsildar Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District. 3. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District. 4. The Village Administrative Officer Siruvalur Village, Erode District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd Respondent in his Proceedings in file No.2025/ 0103/ 10/ 581055 dated 03.03.2026 quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and Coupled with bias and Consequently directing the 3rd Respondent Page2 of 5 to issue a Sub-divide patta for 39.5 cents of land in Re. Sa.Na. 490/3 and 342.27 cents of land in Re.sa.No.490/4 situated in Siruvallur Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District within a time stipulated by this Honble court. For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Swetha For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.