- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 February 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 18620/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
Order
In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Assessment Order dated 31.08.2024 passed by the first Respondent.
¶2The Petitioner has filed an application under Section 161 of the respective GST Enactments on 29.11.2024 for rectification of the aforesaid Order dated 31.08.2024, however, the same came to be rejected vide Order dated 02.04.2025.
¶3The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that a Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01A dated 05.01.2024 was issued to the Petitioner, to which, the Petitioner had filed reply in Form GST DRC-06 dated 08.01.2024, based on which, out of 16 defects, 13 defects were dropped. However, insofar as defects 4, 11 and 16 are concerned, the demand proposed in the Show Cause Notice has been confirmed vide the impugned Assessment Order.
¶4I have perused the impugned Order dated 31.08.2024 and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.
¶5This Court is of the considered view that the impugned Order dated 31.08.2024 insofar as Defects 4 &11, viz., Observation Slip-4 : Credit Notes and ii) Observation Slip-11 : Any other Income -2019-2020 calls for interference of this Court, as the Petitioner has made out a case.
¶6Accordingly, the case is remitted back to the first Respondent for de novo adjudication insofar as defects 4 and 11 are concerned.
¶7As far as the Defect No.16 is concerned, it is noticed that the Assessment Officer failed to establish a direct nexus between the production and electricity consumed for the manufacture of aluminium profiesbards/tubes and arrived at a concludion that there is an excesss consimption of electricty in few montshs in respect of few months and not considered the less consuption of electricity copuled with increase in production and alleged that the Petitoner had indulged in unaccounted production.
¶8This Court would like to point that a Show Cause Notice should be clear for an assessee to file proper reply, whereas, in this case, the Respondent has issued a Show Cause Notice in a cladestine manner, as to on what aspect, the Petitioner has to file reply.
¶9Therefore, the case is remitted back to the first Respondent to issue a corrigendum to the aforesaid Show Cause Notice-01A dated 08.02.2024, to which, the Petitioner shall reply within a peirod of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
¶10The Petitioner shall also file a detailed reply to the defects 4, 11 along with all supporting documents to substantiate their claim in respect of the aforesaid three defects.
¶11Thereafter, the Respondent shall proceed to pass final orders on merits.
¶12This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
05.02.2026 sd Index : yes/no To
¶1The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Intelligence-1 Room No.240, 2nd Floor, No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006.
¶2The State Tax Officer Group IX, Intelligence-I Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST) Chennai Intelligence -I ,Room No.133, First Floor, No.1, PAPJM Buildings Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006. C.Saravanan,J., sd W.P.Nos.18620 of 2025
05.02.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.02.2026 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice C.Saravanan W.P.Nos.18620 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.20866 of 2025 M/s. K.M.C Aluminium Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Authorized Signatory. ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Intelligence-1 Room No.240, 2nd Floor, No.1, PAPJM Buildings, Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006. 2. The State Tax Officer Group IX, Intelligence-I Office of the Joint Commissioner (ST) Chennai Intelligence -I ,Room No.133, First Floor, No.1, PAPJM Buildings Greams Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006. ...Respondents For Petitioner . : Mr.Deepak Kumar for .Sanskar Samdaria For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records culminating in the impugned order in Ref.No.ZD330824311092T in GSTIN /33AACCK5123H1ZX/2019-20 dated 31.08.2024 passed by the first Respondent and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the Respondents to reconsider the objection with documents filed by the Petitioner on file.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.