VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Salai Sivajothi v. Salai Siva Nithi

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 April 2026
Bench
S.Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
CRP 2599/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi

Judgment

ORDER The revision petitioner has filed this revision, against the Docket order in I.A.SR.79 of 2026 in O.S.161 of 2014 dated 16.04.2026 on the file of the Principal District Court in Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Namakkal.

¶2Aggrieved by the docket order passed by the trial court refusing to receive the counterclaim filed by the fifth defendant (a co-sharer), the present revision has been preferred.

¶3The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the trial has commenced, but so far other witnesses have not been cross-examined. At this stage, it is just and necessary to file a counterclaim regarding the share in the property. The required court fee has also been paid. However, the trial court failed to take the counterclaim on file.

¶4Under law, co-sharers are entitled to file a counterclaim by invoking Order VIII Rule 6A CPC. Since the trial has not substantially progressed and only the chief examination of P.W.1 has been filed, the application to receive the counterclaim is maintainable.

¶5In a partition suit, all parties are deemed to be plaintiffs. Therefore, an opportunity must be given to each party to prove their claim over the property, otherwise, it would result in a miscarriage of justice.

¶6Accordingly, the trial court is directed to number the counterclaim and try it along with the suit within two weeks.

¶7The Registry is directed to return all original documents, including the original counterclaim.

¶8In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. 24-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes rri Note: Issue order copy by 27.04.2026. To

¶1The Principal District Court in Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Namakkal.

¶2The section officer, VR section, High Court of Madras. T.V.THAMILSELVI J. rri

24-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI 1. S.Salai Sivajothi D/o. Natarajan, W/o. Sivakumar, D.No.3/171, SF No.306, Maniyakanam Thottam, Manikanatham Village and Post, Paramathi Tk, Namakkal Dt. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Salai Siva Nithi S/o. N.Salai Sivanesan, D.No.3/1, Rangasamypillai 1st Street, Thondikaradu, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist. 2.Minor S.Salai Srinithi D/o. N.Salai Sivanesan, Rep. by guardian and next friend grandfather Thangavel S/o. Ramasamy, D.No.3/1, Rangasamypillai 1st Street, Thondikaradu, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist. 3.S.Natarajan S/o. Melvali Subbaraya Ananthar, Senguttaikadu, Munjanoor Post, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist. 4.Saraswathi W/o. S.Natarajan, Senguttaikadu, Gurusamypalayam, Munjanoor Post, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist. 5.N.Salai Sivanesan S/o. S.Natarajan, Marapalayam Poultry Farm, Vaiyappamalai-Morepalayam Road, Paruthipalli Village and Post, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist 637503. 6.S.Devi W/o. Salai Sivanesan, Marapalayam Poultry Farm, Vaiyappamalai- Morepalayam Road, Paruthipalli Village and Post, Thiruchengodu Taluk, Namakkal Dist 637503. 7.Murugesan S/o. Nallaiyan, Athanur Pudur, Athanur Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal Dist. 8.D.J.Rajendran S/o. D.R.Jeyakannan, D.No.5C, Vithyalaya Road, Seeranampalayam, Salem 7. 9.V.K.Nalliyappan S/o. Karupanna Gounder, D.No.21C, Saradha College Main Road, Salem 7. 10.The Authorized Officer Indian Overseas Bank, Fairlands Branch, Salem. Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, prays to against the Docket order in I.A.SR.79 of 2026 in O.S.161 of 2014 dated 16.04.2026 on the file of the Principal District Court in Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Namakkal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent(s):

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.