VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Joy Alukkas India Pvt Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) (Fac)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 June 2026
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP 18855/2026

Judgment

ORDER An order dated 12.01.2026, as rectified by order dated 06.03.2026, is assailed in this writ petition insofar as it relates to the levy of penalty under Section 40(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. Page2 of 4

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter relates to payment of purchase tax under Section 12(1) of the aforementioned statute. He also submits that said tax was not passed on by the petitioner and that this contention was accepted by the appellate authority in the first round of litigation. In those circumstances, learned counsel contends that the Tribunal erroneously remanded the matter to the original authority and that this culminated in orders impugned herein. He adds that a tax case was filed challenging the remand order of the Tribunal and that the same is at the SR stage.

¶3Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent.

¶4On perusal of orders impugned herein, it is evident that the matter was considered on merits. In those circumstances, I am not inclined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction in view of the existence of an alternative remedy.

¶5Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to lodge a statutory appeal. There shall be an interim stay of coercive or recovery proceedings pursuant to orders impugned herein for a period of thirty days so as to enable the petitioner to lodge the statutory appeal and obtain protection, in the meantime. It is also open to the petitioner to not lodge a statutory appeal, if the petitioner were to Page3 of 4 succeed in the tax case in the meanwhile. The time taken in prosecuting this writ petition is liable to be excluded while computing the applicable limitation period in respect of the appeal. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

03.06.2026 Index: Yes/No mmi To The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC) Gandhipuram Assessment Circle, Coimbatore - 18. WPoNo.o18855oofo2026 SENTHILKUMAR(RAMAMOORTHY,(J. mmi WP(No.(18855(of(2026

03.06.2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. No.20142 of 2026 M/s. Joy Alukkas India Pvt Ltd No. 911, Cross Cut Road,Gandhipuram, Coimbatore - 641 012. ..Petitioner Vs The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC) Gandhipuram Assessment Circle, Coimbatore - 18. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for records on the file of the Respondent herein in TIN. No.33442182689/2011-12 dated 12.01.2026 as rectified on 06.03.2026, in so far as it relates to the levy of penalty under Section 40 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 to the extent of Rs.18,21,621/- and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr.K.A.Parthasarathy For Respondent: Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Govt. Counsel (Tax)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.