VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A. Vinodha v. The Superintendent of Police

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 April 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP Crl. 1035/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. Nirmal Kumar

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri / the 1st Respondent herein to provide Police protection for the Petitioner's life and property. Page2 of 4

2.The petitioner contends that she submitted a representation on

03.03.2026 to the respondent police, stating that Murugan, Ramachandran, Venkatesan, Ellamal, and certain land brokers have conspired to damage her property and attempt to remove its fencing. The petitioner purchased the subject property from one Vinayagamoorthy, and the patta has since been transferred to her name (Patta No. 3771). Despite this, the aforementioned persons, acting with ulterior motives and taking the law into their own hands, have been threatening the petitioner and attempting to encroach upon her property to extort money.

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that the petitioner's complaint was received by the 2nd respondent and is currently pending enquiry in C.No. U4/13353092/2026. The counter-petitioners (Murugan, Ramachandran, Venkatesan, and Ellamal) have been summoned for enquiry. The petitioner is also required to participate in the enquiry and submit the relevant documents. He further stated that appropriate action would be taken against any offenders and the entire process would be completed within two months.

4.Considered the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 4

5.Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondents are directed to conduct an enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 03.03.2026. If the enquiry reveals a genuine threat to the life of the petitioner or a clear attempt at forcible dispossession/criminal trespass, the respondent police shall provide necessary protection and take action against the offenders in accordance with the law. The petitioner is directed to cooperate with the enquiry and produce all necessary title documents and the patta before the respondent police. The respondents shall complete the entire process and pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above directions, this petition is disposed of. No costs. 30-04-2026 ep To

¶1The Superintendent of Police Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

¶2Inspector of Police Karimangalam Police Station, Karimangalam, Dharmapuri District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. Page4 of 4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. ep 30-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR A. Vinodha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 2. Inspector of Police Karimangalam Police Station, Karimangalam, Dharmapuri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- This Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue an order or direction in the nature of Writ, particularly the Writ of Mandamus direct the Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri, the 1st Respondent herein to provide security to the Petitioner life and her property. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S. Ramachandran For Respondent(s): Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.