VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Kaliaperumal S/O.Vidathiran v. The Collector,Cuddalore District

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 July 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 27287/2026

Judgment

Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2026.

¶2Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 and Mr.M.Roshan Atiq, learned Government counsel, takes notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent.

¶3By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation dated 12.03.2026 was made for cancellation of sale deed dated 07.07.2025 and for cancellation of patta before the respondents 1 to

¶3However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this petition. Page3 of 5

¶5In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that as far as the cancellation of sale deed is concerned, the 3rd respondent has no power to do the same. Similarly, the 2nd respondent has no power to cancel the patta. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

¶6Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶7In the case on hand, a representation dated 12.03.2026 was made for cancellation of sale deed dated 07.07.2025 and also for cancellation of patta before the respondents 1 to 3. However, according to the respondents, the 3rd respondent has no power to cancel the sale deed, whereas, the 2nd respondent has no power to cancel the patta.

¶8In view of the above, this Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Revenue Divisional Officer, who is the Competent Authority for cancellation of patta. As far as the cancellation of sale deed is concerned, he can very well approach an appropriate Civil Court and agitate his case. Page4 of 5

¶9With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 16-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nsa To

¶1The Collector,Cuddalore District Cuddalore-607 001.

¶2The Tahsildar Panruti, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.

¶3The Sub-Registrar Kadampuliyur, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. WPoNo.o27287oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMYoJ. nsa WPoNo.o27287oofo2026 16-07-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Kaliaperumal S/o.Vidathiran 81, Nadu Theru, Melkangeyankuppam Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Collector,Cuddalore District Cuddalore- 607 001. 2. The Tahsildar Panruti, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3. The Sub- Registrar Kadampuliyur, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District. 4. K.Sangeetha W/o.S.Mohan No.16, 1st Street, Udayam Nagar, Velacheri, Chennai-042. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 2 and 3 to cancel the Patta from the name of Mr.C.Arumugham in respect of S.No. 134/17 0.0411 Sq.m and S.No. 135/27 0.0080 Sq.m n Melkangeyankuppam Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District Directing 3rd respondent to cancel the sale deed dated 07.07.2025 executed in the name of 4th respondent and registered as Doc.No.2838/ 2025 Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Baskar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran, Govt. counsel for R1 & 2 Mr.M.Roshan Atiq, Govt. counsel for R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.