VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Rajesh Kumar T v. The State Rep.By

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 May 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 11096/2026

Judgment

ORDER Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.84 of 2026 registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 109(1), 309(6) and 351(3) of BNS, is on board for consideration.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner, along with, other accused assaulted the victim with a knife, causing grievous injuries and also criminally intimidated him. Hence the case. Page2 of 5

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence, however, he is suffering incarceration from 24.03.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on him executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with Page3 of 5 two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Combined Court, Tambaram, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

06.05.2026 vkr/ham Page4 of 5 Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order, when uploaded in the official website of this Court, will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Combined Court, Tambaram,

¶2The Inspector of Police, T22-Medavakkam Police station, Chengalpattu.

¶3The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o11096oofo2026 L.VICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ. vkr/ham CRLoOPoNo.o11096oofo2026 06-05-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Rajesh Kumar T ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police T22-Medavakkam Police station, Chengalpattu District. (Crime No. 84 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.84 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.N.Kamalanathan For Respondent: Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.