S. Raja v. The Commissioner of Police

ORDER This Court, on 09.06.2026, had passed the following order: "Today, a Status Report has been filed by the Inspector of Police, V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai.

2.The learned counsel for the Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) submits that, in the present case, fourteen witnesses have been examined and their statements were recorded. He further submits that the investigation is at its final stage.

3.The learned counsel for the Petitioner strongly objected to the submission made by the learned counsel for the Respondents and submitted that neither the Petitioner, Raja, nor his wife, Sarika, was summoned and no statements were recorded. He further submitted that the statements of many of the witnesses have not been recorded. It is also submitted that a table-top investigation has been conducted to facilitate the accused in the case, who is a powerful person and who had recently contested the general election.

4.In view of the specific allegation made, the respondent police is directed to file a counter affidavit giving details of the dates of examination of witnesses and the stage of investigation.

5.Post this case on 23.06.2026."

¶2In continuation and conjunction to the earlier order passed by this Court on 09.06.2026, today, the learned Government Advocate submitted that in this case investigation completed examining 13 witnesses, LW1 to LW13 and Page3 of 4 charge sheet filed before the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai through E-filing No.LTN20230001178C202600170 on 22.06.2026.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner strongly opposed the manner in which charge sheet filed, that too when specific direction was issued by this Court to given details, based on which witnesses examined and statements recorded. To circumvent the same, charge sheet filed in a haste manner.

¶4The apprehension of the petitioner is reasonable but in view of the charge sheet filed before the Court, it is for the petitioner to get a copy from the trial Court. The trial Court, i.e., XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court to take charge sheet on file within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the petitioner has got any objection, he can approach the trial Court.

¶5With the above directions, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 23-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RSI Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR J. RSI To

¶1The XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶2The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai -07.

¶3The Assistant Commissioner of Police 3-4, School Road, D-section, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai - 101

¶4The Inspector of Police V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai.

¶5The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 23-06-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR S. Raja S/o Sekar, No.214-1/68, Senthil Nagar, Sanniyasi Gundu Extension, Kichupalayam, Salem -636015 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai -07. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police 3-4, School Road, D-section, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai - 101 3. The Inspector of Police V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.138/2025). ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to transfer the investigation in Crime No.138 of 2025 pending on the file of the 3rd respondent to any independent agency such as CBCID or any other competent to officer by appreciating the above stated facts and circumstances of the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Balaji For Respondents: Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page2 of 4