VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

T.T.Ravi v. The Inspector General of Registration

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 April 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 17784/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.U. Baranidharan, learned Special Government Advocate takes notice for respondents. By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶2It is stated that the petitioner sought deletion of encumbrance entries relating to Doc. Nos.5728, 5729 and 5770 of 2025 on the file of the 4th respondent/Sub-Registrar, in the light of the common Judgment and Decree dated 26.09.2025 passed in O.S. Nos.202 of 2013 and 78 of 2016 by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore, declaring the settlement deeds as null and void. But till date, the same has not been considered by the respondents. Hence this writ petition.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that despite the decree, certain entries continue, and hence, the petitioner sought for deletion. Therefore, he prayed that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the representations, lastly submitted on 09.02.2026, within a time frame.

¶4Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the 4th respondent will consider the petitioner's representations and he submitted that the main entry will not be deleted and other entries will be deleted in line with the common judgment passed in O.S. Nos.202 of 2013 and 78 of 2016. Hence, this Court may issue suitable directions in the above regard.

¶5Considering the aforesaid submissions, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's representations, lastly submitted on 09.02.2026 and make appropriate entries/endorsements in the relevant records in the light of the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S. Nos.202 of 2013 and 78 of 2016 by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cuddalore, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

30.04.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order vsi2

M. DHANDAPANI, J. vsi2 To :

¶1The Inspector General of Registration Chennai - 600 028.

¶2The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, (Stamps and Registration) Department of Registration, Cuddalore

¶3The District Registrar, Integrated Registration District Complex Department, Cuddalore.

¶4The Joint Sub-Registrar -I Integrated Registration District Complex Department, Cuddalore

30.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.04.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI T.T.Ravi ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration Chennai - 600 028. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Registration, (Stamps and Registration) Department of Registration, Cuddalore 3. The District Registrar, Integrated Registration District Complex Department, Cuddalore. 4. The Joint Sub-Registrar -I Integrated Registration District Complex Department, Cuddalore ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents herein to delete the entries in the encumbrance certificate concerning the fraudulent Sale Deeds in Doc. Nos. 5728, 5729 and 5770 of 2025, on the file of the 4th Respondent herein based on the judgment of this Court dated 15.02.2020 made in WP. No.18721 of 2020 and batch cases reported in 2021 (1) CTC 839 by disposing of the representation of the Petitioner herein dated 02.02.2026 and 09.02.2026 following the common Judgement and Decree dated 26.09.2025 made in O.S. Nos. 202 of 2013 and 78 of 2016, on the file of the I Additional District and Session Judge, Cuddalore. For Petitioner : Mr. P. Dinesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr. U. Baranidharan Spl. Govt. Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.