- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 June 2026
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP 18025/2026
Judgment
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP Nos. 18025 and 18026 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.19373, 19374, 19375 and 19376 of 2026 Kurinji Super Specialities Hospital Pvt Ltd Rep. by its Managing Director Dr.J.Manimaran, No.4/118/1, Dr.T.J.Salai, Five Roads, Salem-636 016. ..Petitioner in both WPs Vs
¶1The Commissioner, Salem Municipal Corporation, Salem-636 001.
¶2The Assistant Commissioner, Suramangalam Zone 1, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem.
¶3The Assistant Revenue Officer, Suramangalam Zone 1 Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem. ..Respondents in both WPs WP No. 18025 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Special Notice dated
18.06.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent and all the consequential Page2 of 5 demand notices issued by the 2nd respondent assessing the property tax of the petitioner hospital at No.4/118/1, Dr.T.J.Salai, Five Roads, Ward-003 Suramangalam Zone, Salem-636 016 in New Property Tax Assessment No.049/ 003/ 905114 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to forbear from demanding property tax based on the said revised tax proceedings for the subsequent assessment years. WP No. 18026 of 2026: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Special Notice dated
19.06.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent and all the consequential demand notices issued by the 2nd respondent assessing the property tax of the petitioner hospital at No.4/118/1, Dr.T.J.Salai, Five Roads, Ward-003 Suramangalam Zone, Salem-636 016 in New Property Tax Assessment No.049/ 003/ 905123 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to forbear from demanding property tax based on the said revised tax proceedings for the subsequent assessment years. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Vijayamehanath for Mr.P.H.Manoj Pandian in both WPs For Respondents: Ms.N.Devi, Standing Counsel in both WPs COMMON ORDER Two special notices enhancing the annual value and the corresponding property tax are challenged herein on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. Page3 of 5
¶2Adverting to the impugned special notices, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier annual value and property tax payable thereon and the new annual value and the property tax payable thereon are mentioned without providing any further details.
¶3Ms.N.Devi, learned Standing Counsel for the Salem Municipal Corporation submits that an opportunity would be provided to the petitioner before fixing the revised annual value. She adds that the annual value and tax liability were enhanced on account of additional construction.
¶4On perusal of the impugned special notices, it is clear that no particulars are provided as to the basis for the revision. It also appears that no opportunity was provided to the petitioner before making such revision. In view thereof, the special notices are set aside. These matters are remanded for reconsideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fresh re-assessment orders shall be issued within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶5The writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
18.06.2026 Index: Yes/No mmi Page4 of 5 To
¶1The Commissioner Salem Municipal Corporation, Salem-636 001
¶2The Assistant Commissioner, Suramangalam Zone 1, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem.
¶3The Assistant Revenue Officer, Suramangalam Zone 1 Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem. Page5 of 5 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. mmi WP Nos. 18025 and 18026 of 2026
18.06.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.