Sudha v. Palanisamy

O R D E R This civil revision petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 03.02.2026 passed by the Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal in I.A.No.12 of 2025 in O.S.No.544 of 2013.

¶2In the aforesaid order, the application filed by the respondents / defendants seeking to condone the delay in filing the additional documents under Order VIII Rule 1(A) 3, has been allowed.

¶3According to the petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the suit, no sufficient cause has been shown by the respondents / defendants in filing I.A.No.12 of 2025 seeking to condone the delay in filing the additional 2\5 documents. The petitioner also disputes the additional documents produced by the respondents through I.A.No.12 of 2025.

¶4The suit is of the year 2013. At this stage, if this Court interferes with the impugned order which has been passed only for granting leave for the respondents to file additional documents and when the rights of the petitioner, who is the plaintiff has not been defeated by the impugned order as the petitioner is always having the right to cross-examine the respondents' witnesses with regard to the additional documents filed by them and also dispute the said documents at the time of arguments in the suit. If this Court issues notice to the respondents in this civil revision petition, it will only delay the disposal of the suit, which is not in the interest of the parties to the dispute.

¶5Therefore, in the interest of justice, without examining the merits of the impugned order and to protect the interests of the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to raise all objections during the cross-examination of the 3\5 respondents' witnesses with regard to the additional documents filed by the respondents / defendants through I.A.No.12 of 2025. The petitioner is also permitted to raise all objections at the time of arguments in the main suit and the trial Court shall consider those objections while pronouncing the judgment in the main suit.

¶6Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents in this civil revision petition, notice to the respondents is dispensed with by this Court. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

23.07.2026 NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji To The Additional District Munsiff, Namakkal. 4\5

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. vji and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2026

23.07.2026 5\5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2026 Sudha ..Petitioner Vs. Kaliyammal (died) 1. Palanisamy, Rep. by its Power Agent, S/o.Chellappan, D.No.6/157, Kongu Nagar, Oruvanthur Puthur Village, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. Selvamani, W/o.Udayakumar, D.No.7/57, Lakkampalayam, Periyapatti Village, Nallipalayam Road, Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal District. 2. Nachammal 3. Chinnammal ..Respondents 1\5 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and final order dated 03.02.2026 in I.A.No.12 of 2025 in O.S.No.544 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal. For Petitioner : Mr.Sam Jayaraj Houston for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates