Uma v. State Rep by

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.14 of 2022 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC & ST Act, Cuddalore, as against the petitioner, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 355 of IPC read with Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.

¶2Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and amicably settle the dispute among themselves.

¶3A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioner/A1, A2 and the defacto complainant and also by their respective counsel. The third petitioner/A3 appeared through video-conference, while petitioner/A1 and A2 appeared in person and were identified by their respective counsel and the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. Page3 of 5

¶4Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceeding pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, quashes the proceeding in S.C.No.14 of 2022 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC & ST Act, Cuddalore.

¶5In view of the above, the proceedings in S.C.No.14 of 2022 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for trial of cases under SC & ST Act, Cuddalore, are hereby quashed as against the petitioners. The terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order.

¶6Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order LPP Page4 of 5 To

1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST Act, Cuddalore

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mangalampet Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Mangalampet Police Station, Cuddalore District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o7683oofo2023 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANoJ. LPP Crl.O.P.No.o7683oofo2023 and Crl.M.P.No.o4926oofo2023 27-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 7683 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No. 4926 of 2023 Uma ..Petitioner Vs 1. State Rep By The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mangalampet Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. State Rep By The Sub Inspector of Police, Mangalampet Police Station, Cuddalore District. Cr.No.370/2021. 3. Suresh ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petitioner filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in chargesheet pertaining to S.C.No.14 of 2022 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST Act, Cuddalore and quash the final report. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Karthikeyan for Mr.K.Manikandan For Respondents: Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R1 And R2 Mr.Suresh, Party-in-person for R3 Page2 of 5