VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Seenivasan v. The State Rep by Its

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 July 2025
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP 18404/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.S. RameshFollow V. Lakshminarayanan

Judgment

ORDER

M.S.RAMESH, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records connected with impugned order dated 23.04.2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenu, Appu @ Rajendran, S/o.Seenivasan, aged about 34 years, bearing Convict No.6817 (PID No.52970) confined at Central Prison-I, Puzhal.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 2nd respondent vide impugned order 23.04.2025 had rejected the petitioner's representation dated 22.04.2025, seeking for grant of 28 days ordinary leave to his son, on the ground that the subsequent spell of ordinary leave will only be granted after the completion of one year of imprisonment from the date on which the convict prisoner returns from the last ordinary leave. The petitioner is having many age related ailments like diabetics, high blood pressure and kidney problem also. The petitioner's daughter who has come to their house for her first delivery is also expecting her brother's presence. Hence, the petitioner seeks 28 days ordinary leave to his son to make financial arrangements for his medical treatment and also for the delivery of his sister.

¶3Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced a report of the Probation Officer dated 21.05.2025, in which it is stated that 28 days of ordinary leave was granted to the petitioner's son without escort from

23.05.2024 to 21.06.2024 and he is not eligible for ordinary leave as per Rule 22(3) of Tamil Nadu Suspension of Sentence Rules, 1982 as amended in G.O.Ms.No.205, Home (Prison-V) Department, dated

25.04.2022.

¶4Since the first spell of ordinary leave granted to the prisoner got expired on 21.06.2025, and the Probation Officer has also in his report stated that the reasons assigned in the representation for seeking leave is genuine, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

5.This Writ Petition stands allowed accordingly. The impugned proceedings of the 2rd respondent dated 23.04.2025 is hereby set aside. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the respondents herein, to grant 28 days ordinary leave "without escort" to the life convict viz. Appu @ Rajendran, S/o.Seenivasan, Convict No.6817 (PID No.52970), commencing from 11.07.2025 to 07.08.2025, with a condition that the life convict shall report before the jurisdictional Police i.e. L & O North Police Station, Vellore, daily at 10.30 a.m. After expiry of the Ordinary Leave, the life convict shall surrender before the Jail Authority on

08.08.2025 before 10.00 a.m. The prisoner shall utilize the leave only for the purpose for which it has been granted and shall not indulge in any other activities. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [M.S.R, J.] [V.L.N, J.]

04.07.2025 kas Note: Issue Order Copy on 10.07.2025 To

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008

2.The Superintendent Puzhal Central Prison Puzhal 600 066

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai W.P.No.18404oofo2025 M.S.RAMESH,oJ. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,oJ. kas W.P.No.18404oofo2025 andoW.M.P.No.20606oofo2025

04.07.2025 Pageo6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.20606 of 2025 Seenivasan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State represented by its The Deputy Inspector General of Prison Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008 2.The Superintendent Puzhal Central Prison Puzhal 600 066 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records connected with impugned order dated 23.04.2025 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and directing the respondents to grant ordinary leave for 28 days without escort to the detenu, Appu @ Rajendran, S/o.Seenivasan, aged about 34 years, bearing Convict No.6817 (PID No.52970) confined at Central Prison-I, Puzhal. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Sadhana For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.