VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

The Divisional Manager v. S.Gayatri

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2026
Bench
K.Kumaresh Babuauthor
Case no.
CMA 3390/2021

Judgment

JUDGMENT The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed to set aside the decree and judgment passed in M.C.O.P.NO. 324 of 2018 dated 03.02.2021 Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge) Tirupattur. Page2 of 4

¶2Heard Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

¶3In spite of notice having been served on respondents 1 and 2 and their names also having been printed in the cause list today, there is no representation on the side of the respondents 1 and 2.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would contend that the appeal had been filed, challenging the liability that had been fixed, as also the compensation. In the said accident, three individuals were involved and two of the individuals had suffered fatal injuries and the claimant in the present appeal had been awarded with the compensation of Rs.74,000/- at 7.5% interest. In the case of the two fatal cases, award came to be passed and the same were challenged before this Court in C.M.A.Nos.2738 & 2741 of 2021 dated

13.12.2024 and would fairly submit that the contributory negligence of 15% had been fixed for not wearing the helmet and also rejected the claim of liability on the part of the appellant. She would fairly submit that applying the aforesaid judgment, the contributory negligence of 15% can also be included in the award and the award may be modified appropriately.

¶5A perusal of the judgment made in C.M.A.Nos.2738 & 2741 of 2021 dated 13.12.2024, would indicate that this Court had fixed the liability of 15% Page3 of 4 on the rider of the bike and had held the appellant liable to pay 85% of the award amount. Applying the same, it is imperative that the award granted in this case also has to be modified, fixing the liability of the appellant at 85% alone.

¶6Accordingly, the appeal stands partly-allowed by holding that the appellant will be liable to pay 85% of the award amount as fixed by the Tribunal, as this Court do not find any material infirmity in the quantum that have been arrived at by the Tribunal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kak To The Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge), Tirupattur. CMAoNo.o3390oofo2021 K.KUMARESHoBABU,oJ. kak CMAoNo.o3390oofo2021 27-03-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and C.M.P.No.19552 of 2021 The Divisional Manager The Divisional Office, Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd, Vellore. ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. S.Gayatri 2. H.Abdul Haleem ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, praying to set aside the decree and judgment passed in M.C.O.P.NO. 324 of 2018 dated 03.02.2021 Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge) Tirupattur. For Appellant(s): Mr.J.Chandran For Respondent(s): R1 & R2 – Served - No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.