- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 June 2026
- Bench
- C.Kumarappan
- Case no.
- CRL OP 11975/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(A) and 4(1) (C) Tamilnadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2024 in Crime No.133 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that when the respondent police were in regular patrol duty, they found that the petitioner was found in possession of 114 bottles of various types of liquor. Hence, the case.
¶3The learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that an FIR came to registered against him for possession of 114 bottles of liquor. The learned counsel would invite the attention of this Court about the medical condition of the petitioner that the petitioner is suffering from a cancer. In support of his contentions, he has produced the petitioner's discharge summary of Cancer Institute, Adayar. He further submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit any amount without prejudice to his claim Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Page2 of 6
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation of this case is pending. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
¶5Though this Court is taking serious view against the prohibition offences, as it will affect the society, while perusing the Discharge Summary of the Petitioner, the petitioner has taken treatment since 2023 for Synchronous Carcinoma Transverse and Sigmoid Colong (MSI +) .
¶6Considering the above medical condition, this Court shows some lineancy towards the petitioner, and this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
¶8Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate -II, Thirupathur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: Page3 of 6 [a] if the petitioner fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only)(Non refundable) towards the account of CANCER INSTITUTE (WIA), Adayar, Savings Bank Account maintained at Union Bank of India, Madhya Kailash Branch, Cancer Institute(WIA), Dr.S.Krishnamurthi Campus, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai-36, bearing SB Account No.149710011005477, IFSC Code No.UBIN0814971, Branch Name and Code 814971, MICR No.600026110 and to produce the Bank Challan before the concerned Magistrate and the receipt shall be produced at the time of executing the bond; Page4 of 6 [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 02-06-2026 VV To
¶1The Judicial Magistrate-II, Thirupathur
¶2The Inspector of Police, Kandili Police Station Tirupattur District.
¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page5 of 6 CRLoOPoNo.o11975oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. VV CRLoOPoNo.o11975oofo2026 02-06-2026 Page6oofo6 Page7 of 6
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Balakrishnan S/o.Munisamy, No.3/11, Ambedkar Nagar, Kandili Post, Tirupattur Taluk and District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kandili Police Station Tirupattur District. (Crime.No.133/2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime.No.133/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Ms.R.Thulasi For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page1 of 6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.