VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ajith v. State by the Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 May 2026
Bench
P.Dhanabalauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 12711/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Dhanabal

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(2), 126(2), 109(1) @ 196(b), 126(2), 109(1) and 191(3) of BNS (Sections 294(b), 341, 147 and 307 of IPC) in Crime No.129 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant regarding previous enmity. Due to the which, the petitioner along with others had abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with knife and caused injuries to him. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent, the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the co-accused were enlarged on bail. Hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and further submitted that, apart from this case, the petitioner is having five previous cases including 4 NDPS cases. He further submits that the petitioners earlier anticipatory bail Page2 of 6 petitions were dismissed by this Court vide order dated 07.10.2025, 29.01.2026,

25.03.2026 in Crl.OP.Nos.22833 of 2025, 1909 and 7508 of 2026 respectively. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the rival submissions, nature of offences, injured discharged from the hospital, though the petitioner is having five previous cases, they are not similar kind of offences and in all cases bail was granted to him, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruttani on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who Page3 of 6 intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. Page4 of 6 [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 14-05-2026 VV Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruttani 2 The Inspector of Police, Thiruvenlangadu Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page5 of 6 CRLoOPoNo.o12711oofo2026 P.DHANABAL,oJ. VV CRLoOPoNo.o12711oofo2026 14-05-2026 Page6oofo6 To State by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvelangadu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.129 of 2025) . Page7 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Ajith S/o.Kannaiyan, No.83, Ellaiamman Koil Street, Periya colony, Thirupachur, Thiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvelangadu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.129 of 2025) . ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.129 of 2025 on the file of respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sasikumar For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page1 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.