Murali Narayanappa v. The Sub Divisional

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records with regard to the impugned order dated 17.05.2024 passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.346 of 2024 /B1 and to quash the same.

¶2Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the official respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶3Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a civil suit is pending between the parties. Pending civil suit, the first respondent has passed the impugned order and the same is beyond the scope and object of Section 145 Cr.P.C. Hence, he prayed to set aside the impugned order passed by the first respondent.

¶4On 11.06.2025, this Court directed both the first respondent herein-The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector and the Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District to appear before this Court. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, they appeared.

¶5On a perusal of the materials available on record, it is seen that the first respondent referred the pendency of the suit between the parties in the impugned order itself. Further, the Police has no authority to refer the matter before the Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Hosur had interfered with the civil dispute under the guise of law and order problem. Section 145 Cr.P.C., is very clear that, if any party is creating a law and order problem, based on the interference of the possession of the property, in order to maintain law and order problem, the Police has to refer the matter before the Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector or the Magistrate as the case may be, to maintain peace. Whereas in this case, already parties have approached the Civil Court to settle their civil dispute and the same is pending.

¶6The dispute between the parties is regarding the possession of the property and the same had already been seized of by the competent civil Court. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Hosur has no authority to interfere with the civil dispute between the parties. Hence, the impugned order passed by the first respondent is liable to be set aside and the same is set aside.

¶7Both the Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-cum-Sub Collector, Hosur and the Inspector of Police, Kelamangalam Police Station, Krishnagiri District are directed not to interfere with the Civil dispute between the parties, while the same is pending before the civil Court.

¶8In view of the same, this Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

16.06.2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To

¶1The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Sub Collector, Hosur.

¶2The District Collector, Krishnagiri.

¶3The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. W.P.No.19414oooofo2025o P.VELMURUGAN,oJ mfa W.P.No.19414ooofo2025 and W.M.P.Nos.21668o&o21669ooooofo2025

16.06.2025 Pageo7oofo7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No.19414 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.21668 & 21669 of 2025 Murali Narayanappa ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Sub Collector, Hosur. 2. The District Collector, Krishnagiri. 3. The Tahsildar, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District. 4. Avigna Amaira Private Limited, Rep. By its Authorised Signatory, Mr.P.Sathish Kumar, Having registered office at No.1822, I Block, 13th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai -40. 5. Lokesh 6. Lalitha 7. Krishnamoorthy 8. Saraswathi 9. Narayanamma 10.Prakash 11.Pathi 12.Rajkumar 13.Manoranjitha 14.Santhamma 15.Savithiriyamma 16.Lakshmidevi 17.Rukmani 18.Yasodha ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records leading to pass the impugned order of the first respondent dated 17.05.2024 in Na.Ka.No.346 of 2024 /B1 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari Senior Advocate For Mr.M.Narayanaswamy For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)