VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R Sivakumar v. The State Rep by Its Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 May 2026
Bench
R.Sakthivelauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 12570/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on

11.05.2026 under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, praying to grant bail. Page2 of 4

¶2The petitioner/Accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.01.2026 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 326(g), 103(1) of BNS and Section 4 of the TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.01 of 2026 on the file of the respondent-police.

¶3The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/ accused and the victim are husband and wife. The petitioner/accused, on coming to know about the extra marital affair of his wife with one Sakthivel, murdered both his wife and her paramour by setting fire to the thatched house where they were living. Initially the case was registered under 194(1) of BNSS and later, during the investigation, the case was altered to one under Sections 127(2), 326(g), 103(1) of BNS and Section 4 of the TNPPDL Act.

¶4Mr.P.Jayachandran, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case, solely on suspicion. He further submits that this is the second bail application of the petitioner before this Court and he has been suffering incarceration from

05.01.2026. He, however, submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He therefore prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5Per contra, Mr.L.Baskaran, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent-police submits that the petitioner/accused Page3 of 4 committed murder of his wife and the person with whom his wife developed extra marital relationship. He further submits that there are 12 previous cases against the petitioner. He also submits that the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9444 of 2026 was dismissed by this Court on

16.04.2026 and there is no change in circumstances. Hence, he opposes the grant of bail and accordingly, he prays to dismiss the petition.

¶6Heard on both sides. This Court has perused all the materials available on record.

¶7Considering the facts and cumulative circumstances of the case, when this Court specifically questioned the learned counsel for the petitioner to state any change in circumstances, the learned counsel was unable to do so. Since no change in circumstances has been shown, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶8Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20-05-2026 VKR Page4 of 4

R.SAKTHIVEL, J. VKR Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order on the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded on Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order, when uploaded on the official website of this Court, will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Vellore.

3.The Inspector of Police Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 20-05-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-05-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL R.Sivakumar S/o.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner/Accused Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.01/2026) ..Respondent/complainant PRAYER:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying to grant bail to the petitioner in Crime No.01 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.P.Jayachandran For Respondent: Mr.L.Baskaran, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.