- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 May 2026
- Bench
- P.Dhanabal
- Case no.
- CRL OP 12333/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.Dhanabal
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
02.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 115(2), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.208 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 6
¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner committed robbery of a sum of Rs. 1,500/- from the de facto complainant at knife-point. Hence, the present case.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent police have registered a false case against the petitioner. The petitioner is under judicial custody since 02.04.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.
¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has seven previous cases registered against him. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.
¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
¶6Considering the rival submissions made on either side, the nature of the offences alleged against the accused, and the nominal amount of money involved in this case, and taking into consideration that the investigation is still pending, that the petitioner has been enlarged on bail in all the previous cases, and that those cases are not similar in nature, this Court is inclined to grant bail Page3 of 6 to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-2, Poonamallee and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by Page4 of 6 the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 13-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kmm Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To
¶1Judicial Magistrate-2, Poonamallee.
¶2The Inspector of police, T-4, Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai – 95.
¶3The Superintendent, Poonamallee Sub Jail, Chennai.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Page6 of 6
P.DHANABAL, J. kmm CRL.O.P.No.12333 of 2026 13-05-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL.O.P.No.12333 of 2026 Saravanan ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of police, T-4, Madhuravoyal Police Station, Chennai – 95. Cr. No.208 of 2026 ..Respondent Prayer: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.208/2026 on the file of the Inspector of police, T-4, Madhuravoyal Police Station at Chennai and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Ranjith Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.