P.Anandha Krishnan v. Home, Prohibition and Excise Department

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

26.04.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 75, 329(4), 351(2) BNS and r/w Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Cr. No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The case of the prosecution is that on 25.04.2026, when the defacto complainant was sleeping at her house, the petitioner, in an inebriated condition trespassed into her house and misbehaved with her. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner is under judicial custody since 26.04.2026. He further submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioner. He further submitted that the investigation has been completed. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the nature of offence and that the investigation has been completed and the fact that the petitioner has no previous cases and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: Page3 of 6 [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.XXIII, Saidapet and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; Page4 of 6 [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 13-05-2026 Anu Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Metropolitan Magistrate No.XXIII, Saidapet

¶2The Inspector of Police, R-10 M.G.R Nagar Police Station

¶3The Superintendent Sub Jail, Saidapet

¶4The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. CRLoOPoNo.o12427oofo2026 P.DHANABAL,oJ. Anu CRLoOPoNo.o12427oofo2026 13-05-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL P.Anandha Krishnan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep by the Inspector of Police, R-10 M.G.R Nagar Police Station Cr.No.121 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Adithya Varadarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinoth Raja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)