Dhineshkumar v. The State Rep by Its the Inspector of Police,

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2), 326(a) of B.N.S. 2023 r/w. Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in connection with the case in Crime No.134 of 2026, seeks Page2 of 6 anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 3 Units of Pebble Stones without valid permit from the Government. Hence the case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and that the custodial interrogation is not required in this case and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and further submitted that, apart from this case, the petitioner has no other previous case and the pebble stones and vehicle were seized.

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Considering the nature of allegations and considering the nature and quantity of minerals involved in this case, the fact that the petitioner has no Page3 of 6 other previous cases, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at

10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Page4 of 6 Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 14-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MTL/SSB Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District

2.The Inspector of Police, Virudhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.134 of 2026)

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o12954oofo2026 P.DHANABAL,oJ. MTL/SSB CRLoOPoNo.o12954oofo2026 14-05-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Dhineshkumar S/o.Arumugam, 311, East Street, Pudhupettai, Palakollai,Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by its The Inspector of Police, Virudhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.134 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Cr. No. 134 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Raji For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)