M/S.Fortune Imports v. The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Appeal Rejection order dated 23.10.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent and the rectification order dated 27.03.2024 passed by the 2nd Respondent.

¶2By the aforesaid appeal rejection order dated 23.10.2024 the petitioner's appeal against rectification order dated 27.03.2024 was rejected on the ground of limitation.

¶3Earlier, the petitioner was suffered an Assessment order dated

29.12.2023, whereby the following demand was confirmed against the petitioner. Sr. No. Tax Interest Penalty Total 3,02,230.00

3.09,864.00 30,223.00 6,42,317.00 Total 6,04,460.00 6,19,728.00 60,446.00 12,84,634.00

¶4Aggrieved by the aforesaid Assessment order, the petitioner filed an application for rectification. The said application culminated in an order dated

27.03.2024, whereby the demand confirmed vide the assessment order dated Page3 of 5

29.12.2023 was partly modified, the tax liability as detailed below:- Sr. No. Tax Interest Penalty Total

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00 3,02,230.00

3.09,864.00 30,223.00 6,42,317.00

¶5In this background, the petitioner had filed an appeal on 01.04.2024 before the Appellate Authority challenging the impugned Rectification order dated 27.03.2024. However, the same was rejected on 23.10.2024 on the ground of limitation. Since the petitioner's appeal was confined only to the rectification order dated 27.03.2024, the rejection of the appeal on the ground of limitation cannot be countenanced.

¶6Considering the above, the impugned order dated 23.10.2024 passed by the first respondent is set aside and the case is remitted back to the first respondent to pass a fresh order on their own merits and in accordance with law, without reference to limitation, and to pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible.

¶7Needless to state, before passing any final orders the 1st Respondent Appellate Authority shall give due notice to the petitioner. Page4 of 5

¶8It is made clear that if the bank account of the petitioner has been attached, such attachment shall be lifted, subject to the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶9This Writ Petitions stand disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 04-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order av To

¶1The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Appellate Authority, Chennai.

¶2The Assistant Commissioner Chennai south, Zone-South-I, Circle-Alwarpet, Tamil Nadu. Page5 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J. av 04-02-2026

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.25017 & 25021 of 2025 M/S.Fortune Imports Rep by its Proprietor Mr. Himanshu Pravinchandra Somani, Plot No 128 to 136, Ground Floor, Kumarrajan Nagar Mahaveer Estate, Unnamed Road, Chennai 600 060. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Appellate Authority, Chennai. 2. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai South: Zone- South- I, Circle- Alwarpet, Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Order for APL-02 bearing Reference Number.ZD331024168568A dated 23.10.2024 on the file of the First Respondent and Rectification Order bearing Reference Number.ZD33032418852B dated 27.03.2024 on the file of the Second Respondent and quash the same. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner(s): M/s.Prince Simon For Respondent(s): M/s..P.Selvi Government Advocate