VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Modine Thermal Systems Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs, Chennai II

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
Mohammed Shaffiqauthor
Case no.
WP 20181/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Mohammed Shaffiq

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct second respondent to amend 23 Bills of Entry filed by petitioner during the period November, 2021 to March, 2022 to reflect the factum of payment of integrated goods and services (IGST) and interest by petitioner against the said Bills of Entry.

¶2Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the above request was made in terms of Section 149 of the Customs Act read with paragraph 2.3 of Circular No.233/27/2024-GST dated 10.09.2024 issued by CBIC. He would also submit that a representation was also been made by petitioner in this regard as early as on 25.01.2023, and the said representation has not been acted upon.

¶3Learned Senior Standing Counsel for respondents would submit that there is some uncertainty as to whether the said representation is available on file or not.

¶4When this Court suggested that petitioner may submit another set of documents along with a fresh representation before the respondents and that on receipt of such representation, the same could be disposed of, within a period of six weeks, same was agreed to by learned counsel for petitioner and respondents. Page3 of 5

¶5Heard the counsels and perused the materials available on record.

¶6In that view of the matter, this court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with following directions:

i) It is open to petitioner to submit a fresh representation along with another set of documents before respondents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ii) If any such representation is made, respondents shall examine the same and pass orders, in accordance with law, after affording petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of such representation.

¶7Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MRN Page4 of 5 To

¶1Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II, No.60, Custom House, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

¶2Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Group 5, No.60, Custom House, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. Page5 of 5

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. MRN 03-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Modine Thermal Systems Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, R.Annapoorani, Assistant Manager- Indirect Taxation, K7, Sipcot Industrial Village, Mambakkam Village, Sunguvarchatram 602 106. ..Petitioner Vs 1. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai-II, No.60, Custom House, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. 2. Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Group 4A, No.60, Custom House, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to re assess the 23 Bills of Entry as requested in letters dated 25.01.2023 and 16.10.2023 so as to reflect the IGST and interest paid by the petitioner and enable the petitioner to avail Input Tax Credit of IGST paid in respect of the imported goods. For Petitioner : Mr.Raghavan Ramabadran For Respondents: Mr.R.P.Pragadish Senior Standing Counsel Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.