VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

E.Veerapandiyan v. The State Rep By,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
13382/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2) of BNS 2023, r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.677 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 2 units of pebbles in a tipper lorry. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and that he is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner has one previous case and has doing similar nature offences. He further submitted that the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 01.12.2025 and

23.03.2026 in Crl.OP.Nos.32800 of 2025 and 7246 of 2026 respectively . Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Page2 of 4

¶5Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.

¶6From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) it is pellucid that the petitioner has misused the liberty which had been granted by this Court in earlier point of time. Hence, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and there is no change of circumstances after the dismissal of the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petitions, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner do not deserve anticipatory bail.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 05-06-2026 VV To

¶1The Inspector of Police,

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras Page3 of 4 CRLoOPoNo.o13382oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. VV CRLoOPoNo.o13382oofo2026 05-06-2026 Page4oofo4 To The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.677 of 2025)No, 391, Collony Street,Nadiyapattu,Virudhachalam Taluk,Cuddalore District Page5 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN E.Veerapandiyan S/O Ezhumalai, No.391,Collony Street, Nadiyapattu, Virudhachalam Taluk, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.677 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in event of the arrest in connection with the Crime No.677 of 2025 on the file of respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Balachandran T For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page1 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.