Amutha v. The State Rep By,

O R D E R The Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.11 of 2024 in Crime No.25 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for SC/ST at Perambalur District as against petitioners/accused 2 to 4.

¶2In the complaint it is alleged by the second respondent herein/de-facto complainant that A1 and the de-facto complainant had loved each other and based on the false promise that he will marry the de-facto complainant, A1 had sexual intercourse with her in a forceful manner on several times and she got pregnant and it was informed to A1. At that time, A4 had given some tablets to the de-facto complainant for the purpose of abortion and by coercion aborted the fetus. When the de-facto complainant has constantly approached A1 for arrangement of marriage, he evaded the same by citing one or other reasons. While that being so, on 08.02.2023, the de-facto complainant went to the house of A1, at that time A2 and A3, who are the mother and brother of A1 scolded the de-facto complainant by citing her community name and also by using unparliamentary words and consequently, A1 took the de-facto complainant in his bike and brutally attacked her with wooden stick and also threatened her with dire consequences. Hence, she lodged a complaint against the petitioners and a case was registered in Crime No.25 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 313, 324, 417, 376 and 506(1) IPC read with Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(w)(i) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. On completion of investigation, the first respondent-Police filed a final report/charge sheet against the petitioners before the learned Special Judge for SC/ST Act Cases, Perambalur District. The learned Special Judge took cognizance of the case in Spl.S.C.No.11 of 2024.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners/A2 to A4 are mother, brother and sister of A1 and the de-facto complainant and A1 had loved each other without the knowledge of the petitioners herein. The petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the de-facto complainant. The first respondent-Police falsely implicated the petitioners in the case and prima facie there are no materials made out against the petitioners and there is no need to face the ordeal of trial and hence, the charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.11 of 2024 in Crime No.25 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for SC/ST at Perambalur District may be quashed as against petitioners/accused 2 to 4.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶5This Court, after perusing the complaint, charge-sheet and statements of witnesses recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., and other materials, is of the view that it is a matter for trial and all the points raised by the petitioners herein have to be agitated only before the trial Court. Therefore this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings by exercising the power under Section 528 BNS, 2023.

¶6In view of the above, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

12.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To

¶1The Special Judge Special Court for SC/ST Cases, Perambalur District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Perambalur District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms

12.06.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN 1. Amutha 2. Harisankar 3. Chitra ... Petitioners Vs. 1. The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Perambalur District, (Ref: Crime No.25 of 2023) 2. Kavitha ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, to call for the records and quash the charge sheet as far as petitioners/accused 2 to 4 are concerned, in Spl.S.C.No.11 of 2024 in Crime No.25 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for SC/ST at Perambalur District. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Ramar For Respondents : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1