VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Govindaraj v. The District Collector

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 20325/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2023 and consequently to do the necessary rectifications in the revenue records in S.Nos. 168/11, 168/12, 168/16 and 168/17.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3.The case of the petitioner is that the survey numbers of the petitioner property has been wrongly entered as S.Nos.168/11 and 168/12 instead of S.Nos.168/16 and 168/17 during the purchase of the subject land. However, the petitioner is cultivating and in possession of the subject land. Hence, he made a representation to correct the survey numbers in respect of the subject property. Since the same was not considered by the respondents this writ petition has been filed.

4.Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 would submit that in the present case there is a mistake in the survey numbers in the sale deed of the subject property. Under this circumstances, the petitioner has made a representation to rectify the survey numbers as 168/16 and 168/17 instead of 168/11, 168/12 in the revenue records. He would further submit that unless and otherwise the survey numbers are rectified in the sale deed, no rectification can be made in the revenue records.

5.Heard the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5 and perused the materials available on record.

6.As rightly contended by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, the survey numbers of the petitioner's property can be rectified in the revenue records only if the same is rectified in the sale deed of the subject property. However, since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, recording the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is made clear that it is up to the petitioner to rectify the survey numbers in the sale deed and thereafter to approach the respondents to rectify the same in the revenue records. No costs. 17-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Ariyalur And District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Ariyalur And District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Udayar Palayam And Taluk, Ariyalur District.

4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Jayankondam, Ariyalur District.

5.Village Administrative Officer Village Administrative Office, Vanathirayan Pattinam Village And Post, Udayar Palayam Taluk, Ariyalur District. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst

17-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY R.Govindaraj S/o.Regunathan, 1/222, Valluvar Street, Vanathirayan Pattinam Village And Post, Udayar Palayam Taluk, Ariyalur District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Ariyalur And District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Ariyalur And District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Udayar Palayam And Taluk, Ariyalur District. 4.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Jayankondam, Ariyalur District. 5.Village Administrative Officer Village Administrative Office, Vanathirayan Pattinam Village And Post, Udayar Palayam Taluk, Ariyalur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2023 and consequently do necessary rectifications in the revenue records in S.Nos. 168/11, 168/12, 168/16 and 168/17. For Petitioner: For Respondent(s): No Appearance Mr.T.K.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader For R1 to R5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.