VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ajith @ Saliajith v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 14885/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

24.02.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 384, 297 and 506(ii) of IPC read with Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act in Cr. No.3130 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 4

¶2The petitioner is charged for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 384, 297 and 506(ii) of IPC read with Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act and the case is pending in S.C. No.481 of 2025 on the file of the learned Additional District Sessions Judge No.IV, Ponneri. Since the accused failed to appear on

05.11.2025, NBW was issued against him and the petitioner was arrested on execution of non-bailable warrant and remanded to judicial custody on

24.02.2026.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this is a case of jumped bail and due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, non-bailable warrant was ordered to be issued on 05.11.2025. The learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner was arrested on execution of non-bailable warrant and he has been remanded to judicial custody on 24.02.2026 and he is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the earlier bail application was dismissed by this Court on 21.04.2026 and there is no change in circumstances and apart from that, this petitioner has 16 previous cases.

¶5When this Court has put pertinent question as to the change in Page3 of 4 circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to delineate the change in circumstances. Hence considering the above position, this Court is of the firm view that there are no grounds made out to deviate from the earlier circumstance.

¶6Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 12-06-2026 MJS Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Thiruvallur District. CRLoOPoNo.o14885oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. MJS CRLoOPoNo.o14885oofo2026 12-06-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ajith @ Saliajith S/o Devan, No.46 Apparsamy Kovil Street, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai -19 ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by: The Inspector of Police Thiruvottiyur Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.3130 of 2021) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in S.C.No.481 of 2025 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Court IV at Ponneri. For Petitioner(s): M/S. P.Chandrasekar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.