VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

11 Media v. Mookambika Complex Maintenance Association

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 May 2026
Bench
V. Lakshminarayananauthor
Case no.
CMP 13450/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow V. Lakshminarayanan

Judgment

ORDER As the Appellate Court in the City Civil Court complex is not functioning during the vacation, the plaintiff / petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court to receive and transmit the appeal.

¶2Heard Mr.Wilson for M/s.A.S.Kailasam and Associates. Receive and Transmit application allowed.

¶3A perusal of the papers reveals that the plaintiff/appellant is having two advertisement hoardings atop a building called ''the Moogambikai Complex'', situated at Old No.4, New No.7, Lady Desikachari Road, Abhirampuram, Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. The plaintiff had entered into a "leave and license'' agreement with one Vishwanathan. It is his plea from paragraph No.4 of the plaint that the owners and allotees of the units (defendants / respondents) were not granted any right over the terrace area and it continues to vest with his licensor Vishwanathan. As the defendants were interfering with the hoardings raised by the plaintiff, he came forth with a suit for the relief of permanent injunction. Page3 of 5

¶4Pending disposal of the suit, the plaintiff moved an interlocutory application for grant of interim injunction. In the said application, the defendants were served, but they did not enter appearance. They were set exparte. The learned Judge took up the application for disposal. He dismissed the application on the ground that no renewal of the ''leave and license'' agreement had been reported by the plaintiff.

¶5Prima facie, I am of the view that the learned Judge has been under the impression as if the plaintiff had entered into a licence agreement with the defendants 1 to 4. That is not the case, as seen from paragraph No. 4 of the plaint.

¶6The plaintiff fears interference with its business activities only at the instance of the defendants. Despite service of summons, the defendants have not entered appearance. Hence, the averments made in the petition goes uncontroverted. In other words, his specific averment that the defendants do not have any right over the terrace area is not traversed by way of a counter.

¶7In those circumstances, the learned Judge could have considered the Page4 of 5 prima facie case lies with the plaintiff. In addition, for the purpose of erection of the hoardings, the plaintiff has obtained the licence from the competent authorities. It has incurred heavy fees for the said purpose. If the business activities are interfered, it would open to the plaintiff for claim of damages from his clients / advertisers. Hence, I am of the view that pending the appeal, an order of injunction must be granted. Accordingly, injunction is granted.

¶8Registry is directed to transmit the papers to the City Civil Court for the purpose of numbering and for final disposal. Let the appeal and application be numbered by the appellate court.

¶9The plaintiff / appellant shall take steps through Court and privately returnable by three weeks. The appellate court shall list the application after three weeks. 29-05-2026 DS / DN To: The Principal District Judge Chennai. CMPoNo.o13450oofo2026 V.LAKSHMINARAYANANoJ. DS CMPoNo.o13450oofo2026 in CMAoSRoNO.o83620oOFo2026 29-05-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in CMA SR NO. 83620 OF 2026 M/s.11 Media Rep by its Proprietor No.7, 1st Floor Anderson Street Parrys, Chennai - 1. ..Petitioner/Appellant Vs 1. Mookambika Complex Maintenance Association Moogambikai Complex, Old.No.4, New No.7, Lady Desikachari Road, Abhirampuram, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. 2. Kandaswamy 3. R. Akilan 4. Akshay Sarin All having their office at Moogambikai Complex, O.No.4, N.No.7, Lady Dedsikachari Road, Abhirampuram, Alwarpet, Chennai -18. ..Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 24 & 25 of Civil Procedure Code r/w. Section 151, to receive and transmit the said CMA.S.R.No.83620 of 2026 before this Court to the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Chennai. Page2 of 5 For Petitioner / Appellant: Mr.Wilson for A.S.Kailasam and Associates

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.