VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Naseem Kaleem v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 June 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 21261/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation dated 19.11.2025 before the respondents to make correction in the UDR and issue patta in favour of the petitioner in respect of the lands comprised in survey number 379/1A1 admeasuring to an extent of

1.41 acres, survey number 379/1A2 admeasuring to an extent of 1.86 3/4 acres, survey number 379/1A1 admeasuring to an extent of 34 cent and survey number 379/1A2 admeasuring to an extent of 5 cent in common patta No.180 in total an extent of 3.66 3/4 acres, situated at Mookkandapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.

¶3Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner's representation dated 19.11.2025 will be considered within a period of eight weeks.

¶4Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 4

¶5Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated

19.11.2025, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight

(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶6With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VM To:

¶1The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri Collector Office, Krishnagiri district.

¶2The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

¶3The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, SIPCOT Phase-I and II, Hosur, Krishnagiri district. WPoNo.o21261oofo2026 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. VM WPoNo.o21261oofo2026 10-06-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.Naseem Kaleem ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri Collector Office, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Tahsildar, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, SIPCOT Phase-I and II, Hosur, Krishnagiri district. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to correction the UDR Correction with issue patta in the favour of the petitioner in respect of the lands comprised in survey number 379/1A1 admeasuring to an extent of 1.41 acres, survey number 379/1A2 admeasuring to an extent of 1.86 3/4 acres, survey number 379/1A1 admeasuring to an extent of 34 cent and survey number 379/1A2 admeasuring to an extent of 5 cent in common patta No.180 in total an extent of 3.66 3/4 acres, situated at Mookkandapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering the petitioner representation dated 19.11.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Sellapandian For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's Counsel Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.