VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Saiprashant v. The State Rep by

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
5 June 2026
Bench
C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 14156/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

13.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 309(4) and 311 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.0075 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant, who is a practicing Advocate, lodged a complaint stating that on the date of occurrence, at about 10.00 p.m., while he was returning home after closing his office, two unknown persons allegedly attacked him, snatched a 5 sovereign gold chain and fled from the scene. Hence, the case was registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. The learned counsel would also submit that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 13.05.2026. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the case relates to chain snatching. However, it is fairly submitted that the petitioner has no previous criminal antecedents.

¶5I have given anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side. Page3 of 5

¶6This Court is of the view that the occurrence is said to have taken place on 04.03.2026 and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 13.05.2026. Taking into consideration the submission of the learned Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) that the petitioner has no previous case and considering the period of incarceration already undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheyyar, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m., for a period of 30 days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; Page4 of 5 [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order NSL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate Court, Cheyyar.

¶2Central Prison, Vellore.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Cheyyar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o14156oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o14156oofo2026 05-06-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Saiprashant ..Petitioner Vs State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Cheyyar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. (Crime No. 0075 of 2026). ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.0075 of 2026 on the file of the Cheyyar Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner: Mr. R.Mukesh Kannah For Respondent: Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.